Comparative Analysis of CHEK1, Extrachromosomal DNA Dynamics and 1p/19q Status in Lower Grade and High Grade Glioma
Lehrer, S.; Rheinstein, P.
Show abstract
BackgroundExtrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA) drives rapid tumor evolution, genomic instability, and therapy resistance in gliomas by amplifying oncogenes and generating intratumoral heterogeneity. These genomic alterations induce replication-transcription conflicts, creating a dependence on checkpoint kinase 1 (CHK1), encoded by CHEK1, to resolve replication stress. MethodsWe analyzed genomic, transcriptomic, and clinical data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) lower-grade glioma (LGG) and glioblastoma (GBM) cohorts using UCSC Xena and cBioPortal. CHEK1 expression, copy number variation, mutation burden, and fraction of genome altered were correlated with overall survival, TP53, and ATRX status, and 1p/19q co-deletion. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses, log-rank tests, and co-occurrence analyses were performed, and correlations with genomic instability were assessed. ResultsHigh CHEK1 expression and amplification were significantly associated with reduced survival, particularly in 1p/19q-non-codeleted LGG (P < 0.001). CHEK1 amplification correlated with increased mutation burden and a higher fraction of genome altered, indicating a link between replication stress signaling and chromosomal instability. Co-occurrence analysis revealed strong associations between CHEK1 alterations and TP53 mutations, highlighting their cooperative role in replication stress responses. In contrast, 1p/19q-codeleted tumors exhibited lower CHEK1 expression and improved prognosis, suggesting reduced replication stress in this molecular subtype. ConclusionsCHEK1 amplification and overexpression are hallmarks of ecDNA-driven gliomas, linking replication stress to poor clinical outcomes. CHEK1 status--particularly when integrated with 1p/19q co-deletion and genomic instability metrics--may serve as a prognostic biomarker and a predictive marker for therapeutic strategies targeting replication stress. These findings support the development of CHK1 inhibitors and combination approaches as precision treatments for genomically unstable gliomas. A subset of patients (1p/19q-non-codeleted LGG) where CHEK1 expression/amplification is present may have a prognostic and predictive marker for replication stress-targeted therapies.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Disrupting Akt-Wnt/β-catenin signaling suppresses glioblastoma stem cell growth and tumor progression in immunocompetent mice 93%
- Rapid DNA methylation-based classification of pediatric brain tumours from ultrasonic aspirate specimens 92%
- Transcription factors NFIA and NFIB induce cellular differentiation high-grade astrocytoma 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- CD8+ T-cell-mediated immunoediting influences genomic evolution and immune evasion in murine gliomas 95%
- Remote Neuroinflammation in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Correlates with Unfavorable Clinical Outcome 92%
- Zinc Finger MYND-Type Containing 8 (ZMYND8) is epigenetically regulated in mutant Isocitrate Dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) glioma to promote radioresistance 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ganglioglioma deep transcriptomics reveals primitive neuroectoderm neural precursor-like population 93%
- Integrative analysis of DNA methylation suggests down-regulation of oncogenic pathways and reduced de-novo mutation in survival outliers of glioblastoma 93%
- Capture at the single cell level of metabolic modules distinguishing aggressive and indolent glioblastoma cells 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of germline variants in DNA repair pathways on survival and temozolomide toxicity in adults with glioma 95%
- A subset of pediatric thalamic gliomas share a distinct DNA methylation profile, H3K27me3 loss and frequent alteration of EGFR 95%
- FYN tyrosine kinase, a downstream target of receptor tyrosine kinases, modulates anti-glioma immune responses 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.