Back

Personalized Management of Septic Shock Guided by Multimodal Circulatory and Perfusion Monitoring: The PRISM Trial

Chalkias, A.

2025-10-03 intensive care and critical care medicine
10.1101/2025.10.02.25337153 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundSepsis-related organ dysfunction results from complex interactions between systemic hemodynamics, microcirculatory alterations, and cellular metabolic failure. Conventional resuscitation strategies guided by global parameters may miss persistent tissue hypoperfusion, a phenomenon termed "hemodynamic incoherence." The PRISM trial was designed to determine whether individualized management guided by advanced multimodal circulatory and perfusion monitoring improves outcomes in septic shock. MethodsThe PRISM trial is a multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label study with blinded outcome assessment. Adults with septic shock (Sepsis-3 criteria) are randomized (1:1) to structured multimodal monitoring versus standard care. The intervention integrates advanced systemic hemodynamic indices --including mean circulatory filling pressure analogue and other determinants of venous return, heart efficiency, cardiac power output, power efficiency, and volume efficiency-- with a comprehensive perfusion panel (capillary refill time, mottling score, temperature gradients, lactate kinetics, central venous oxygen saturation, venous-arterial carbon dioxide difference, near-infrared spectroscopy-derived skeletal muscle tissue oxygen saturation, and arterial-interstitial glucose gradients). A predefined treatment algorithm links abnormal thresholds to therapeutic interventions. The primary endpoint is change in SOFA and SAPS II scores from baseline to 72 hours. Secondary endpoints include 28-day mortality, ICU and hospital length of stay, ventilator- and vasopressor-free days, lactate clearance, and safety outcomes. DiscussionBy combining advanced hemodynamic physiology with structured multimodal perfusion monitoring, the PRISM trial tests whether individualized, pathophysiology-guided resuscitation can overcome hemodynamic incoherence and improve patient-centered outcomes in septic shock.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.9%
2
Critical Care
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.8%
4
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
6
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.2%
8
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.1%
9
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
10
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
11
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
12
Pediatric Research
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
14
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
15
Journal of Neurotrauma
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
16
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
17
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
18
Neurocritical Care
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
19
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
20
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
21
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
22
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
Physiological Genomics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
25
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
26
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
27
Journal of Leukocyte Biology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
28
International Journal of Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
29
American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
30
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%