Coxmos: Interpretable survival models for high-dimensional and multi-omic data
Salguero, P.; Buendia-Galera, A.; Tarazona, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundSurvival analysis in high-dimensional (HD) and multi-block (MB) settings, such as omic and multi-omic studies, poses major methodological challenges due to multicollinearity, low events-per-variable ratios, and limited model interpretability. While Cox Proportional Hazards models remain widely used, their applicability is restricted in HD scenarios. Machine learning approaches can handle such complexity but often lack interpretability. PLS-based survival models offer an attractive compromise, yet existing implementations provide limited support for model optimization, evaluation, and interpretation. ResultsTo overcome these limitations, we introduce Coxmos, a CRAN R package that integrates adapted Cox regression models with HD-adapted variable selection, and optimized PLS-based approaches tailored for HD and MB data. Coxmos also provides validation, comparison, interpretation, and visualization tools. Benchmarking on clinical, single-omic, and multi-omic datasets demonstrated that Coxmos outperformed other state-of-the-art machine learning methods, while enhancing interpretability. With an ovarian cancer case study, we illustrated how Coxmos facilitates model selection, validation, and biological interpretation in a complex multi-omic survival analysis. ConclusionsCoxmos provides a robust, flexible, and interpretable solution for survival analysis in HD and MB data. By combining optimized PLS-based methodologies with rigorous evaluation and rich visualization tools, Coxmos enables reliable survival prediction and facilitates the identification of relevant risk and protective factors in complex biomedical studies. The package fills an important methodological gap and represents a valuable resource for reproducible and interpretable survival modeling in the big data scenario. AvailabilityCoxmos is available at CRAN repository: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Coxmos.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Unified methods for feature selection in large-scale genomics data with censored survival outcomes 92%
- Identification of Differentially Expressed Gene Modules in Heterogeneous Diseases 92%
- Joint Modeling of Longitudinal Biomarker and Survival Outcomes with the Presence of Competing Risk in Nested Case-Control Studies with Application to the TEDDY Microbiome Dataset 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- SurvMarker: An R Package for Identifying Survival-Associated Molecular Features Using PCA-Based Weighted Scores 93%
- censcyt: censored covariates in differential abundance analysis in cytometry 91%
- seagull: lasso, group lasso and sparse-group lasso regularisation for linear regression models via proximal gradient descent 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Survival analysis of pathway activity as a prognostic determinant in breast cancer 93%
- Methodological Challenges in Translational Drug Response Modeling in Cancer 91%
- A Deep Survival EWAS approach estimating risk profile based on pre-diagnostic DNA methylation: an application to Breast Cancer time to diagnosis 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- qad: An R-package to detect asymmetric and directed dependence in bivariate samples 91%
- Rcompadre and Rage - two R packages to facilitate the use of the COMPADRE and COMADRE databases and calculation of life history traits from matrix population models 90%
- embarcadero: Species distribution modelling with Bayesian additive regression trees in R 89%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.