The role of Remote Clinical Care in Health Promotion: a scoping review protocol
Brown, C.; Bray, N.; Brady, M.; Jones, L.
Show abstract
ObjectiveThis scoping review aims to understand what opportunities exist to provide health promotion to the adult population within remote clinical care. IntroductionWith increasing demand for healthcare in an environment of overstretched healthcare resources, and the legal responsibility on public organisations within Wales to improve long-term health, all opportunities to promote health should be considered. The consolidation of remote clinical care in most western healthcare services may provide such potential opportunities. Inclusion criteriaThe inclusion criteria will incorporate adults contacting remote clinical care services that provide health promotion. It will exclude any sources not written in English, restrict articles to post-2013, and exclude articles that focus entirely on mental well-being or individuals under 16. MethodsSearches will be undertaken in Medline (PubMed), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Embase, Web of Science, Scopus and British Nursing databases to identify published studies. Searches will also be undertaken on Google Scholar, Google, ProQuest Dissertations, and Theses Global, as well as direct contact with NHS 111 (or equivalent) service providers within the UK to identify any grey literature. Searches will also include bibliographic searches of published studies. The JBI methodology for Scoping Reviews will be followed, and data extraction, analysis, and presentation of the results will follow the laid-out principles. As this review forms part of a wider Doctorate in Public Health submission, data screening and selection will be undertaken by the primary author only, and supervision for the doctorate will be undertaken by the other three authors. Review registration numberOpen Science Framework: osf.io/gqh83
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The use of the positive deviance approach for healthcare system service improvement: A scoping review protocol 96%
- Ethnicity and COVID-19 outcomes among healthcare workers in the United Kingdom: UK-REACH ethico-legal research, qualitative research on healthcare workers’ experiences, and stakeholder engagement protocol 95%
- Synthesizing evidence regarding community-based volunteer facilitated programs supporting integrated care transitions from hospital to home: A scoping review protocol 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Protocol for a scoping review investigating success in research capacity building for nurses, midwives and allied health professionals 97%
- Beyond social prescribing - the use of social return on investment (SROI) analysis in integrated health and social care interventions in England and Wales: a protocol for a systematic review 96%
- Knowledge mobilisation of rapid evidence reviews to inform health and social care policy and practice in a public health emergency: appraisal of the Wales COVID-19 Evidence Centre processes and impact, 2021-23 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- A whole system approach to increasing children’s physical activity in a multi-ethnic UK city: a process evaluation protocol 95%
- Development of the Kunonga Framework for Extending Approaches in Health Inequality and Inequity Evidence Syntheses 94%
- How best do we engage the general population in testing for COVID-19? 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Digital Health Interventions and Quality of Home-based Primary Care for Older Adults: A Scoping Review Protocol 95%
- A protocol for a systematic critical realist synthesis of school mindfulness interventions designed to promote pupils’ mental wellbeing 93%
- Impact of relaxing Covid-19 social distancing measures on rural North Wales: a simulation analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Community mobilisation approaches to preventing and reducing adolescent multiple risk behaviour: a realist review protocol 94%
- Is artificial intelligence for medical professionals serving the patients? Protocol for a mixed method systematic review on patient-relevant benefits and harms of algorithmic decision-making 92%
- Understanding the Challenges of Medicine Optimisation Among Older People From Ethnic Minority Communities (Aged 60 Years and Above) With Polypharmacy in Primary Care: A Realist Review Protocol 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.