The Brain Imaging and Neurophysiology Database: BINDing multimodal neural data into a large-scale repository
Maschke, C.; Hadar, P. N.; Zhang, Y.; Li, J.; Ganjoo, G.; Hoopes, A.; Guazzo, A.; Gupta, A.; Ghanta, M.; Nearing, B.; Silvers, C. T.; Gunapati, B.; Thomas, R.; Kim, J. A.; Mukerji, S. S.; Dalca, A.; Zafar, S.; Lam, A.; Mignot, E.; Westover, M. B.
Show abstract
1The Brain Imaging and Neurophysiology Database (BIND) represents one of the largest multi-institutional, multimodal, clinical neuroimaging repositories, comprising 1.8 million brain scans from 38,945 patients, linked to neurophysiological recordings. This comprehensive dataset addresses critical limitations in neuroimaging research by providing unprecedented scale and diversity across pathologies and health. BIND integrates de-identified data from Massachusetts General Hospital, Brigham and Womens Hospital, and Stanford University, including 1,723,699 MRI scans (1.5 Tesla, 3 Tesla, and 7 Tesla), 54,137 CT scans, 5,093 PET scans, and 526 SPECT scans, converted to standardized NIfTI format following BIDS organization. The database spans the full age spectrum (newborn to 106 years) and encompasses diverse neurological conditions alongside healthy patients. We deployed Bio-Medical Large Language Models to extract structured clinical metadata from 84,960 brain-related reports, categorizing findings into standardized pathology classifications. All imaging data are linked to previously published EEG and polysomnography recordings from the Harvard Electroencephalography Database, enabling unprecedented multimodal analyses. BIND is freely accessible for academic research through the Brain Data Science Platform (https://bdsp.io/). This resource facilitates large-scale neuroimaging studies, machine learning applications, and multimodal brain research to accelerate discoveries in clinical neuroscience.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Magnetic resonance imaging datasets with anatomical fiducials for quality control and registration 97%
- A large, curated, open-source stroke neuroimaging dataset to improve lesion segmentation algorithms 97%
- An Annotated Multi-Site and Multi-Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Dataset for the study of the Human Tongue Musculature 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- OpenMAP-T1: A Rapid Deep Learning Approach to Parcellate 280 Anatomical Regions to Cover the Whole Brain 96%
- Lesion aware automated processing pipeline for multimodal neuroimaging stroke data and The Virtual Brain (TVB) 95%
- WMH-DualTasker: A weakly-supervised deep learning model for automated white matter hyperintensities segmentation and visual rating prediction 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated Generation of Cerebral Blood Flow Maps Using Deep Learning and Multiple Delay Arterial Spin-Labelled MRI 96%
- MASiVar: Multisite, Multiscanner, and Multisubject Acquisitions for Studying Variability in Diffusion Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging 95%
- PreQual: An automated pipeline for integrated preprocessing and quality assurance of diffusion weighted MRI images 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Calgary Normative Study: Study Design Of A Prospective Longitudinal Study To Characterize Potential Quantitative Mr Biomarkers Over The Adult Lifespan 90%
- Protocol of the observational study STRATUM-OS: First step in the development and validation of the STRATUM tool based on multimodal data processing to assist surgery in patients affected by intra-axial brain tumours 88%
- Cohort Profile: the Oxford Parkinson's Disease Centre Discovery Cohort Magnetic Resonance Imaging sub-study (OPDC-MRI) 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- QRATER: a collaborative and centralized imaging quality control web-based application. 95%
- A vendor-neutral functional MRI acquisition protocol for multi-site studies 94%
- Longitudinal deformation based morphometry pipeline to study neuroanatomical differences in structural MRI based on SyN unbiased templates 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.