Beyond the Door: Mapping Patient Experiences in an Open-door Inpatient Psychiatric Unit
Cuevas-Esteban, J.; Ruiz-Garros, E.; Romero-Diaz, E.; Motta-Rojas, N.; Jimenez-Fernandez, B.; Fernandez-Ribas, A.; Martinez-Cirera, B.; Moreno-Orea, A.; Miro-Mezquita, L.
Show abstract
Open-door policies in inpatient psychiatric care have been increasingly adopted to enhance patient autonomy and reduce coercive practices. However, systematic methodologies for evaluating patient experiences in these settings remain limited. This study applies Patient Journey Mapping within an open-door acute psychiatric unit, to comprehensively analyze the hospitalization experience. Using a mixed-methods approach, qualitative data were first collected via focus groups (n=18), adhering GRAMMS guidelines, to identify critical touchpoints, and then quantitative data (n=32) were gathered through an adapted Likert-type ordinal scale to assess patient satisfaction. Data were analyzed using content analysis methodology. Results delineate key hospitalization phases and identify "Moments of Truth," "Moments of Pain," and "Wow Moments," which significantly shape patients perceptions of care quality. While open-door policies promote autonomy and reduce psychological distress, challenges persist in admission processes, medication administration privacy, and communication regarding structured activities. These findings highlight the need for patient-centered methodologies in psychiatric care to optimize service delivery, foster therapeutic environments, and enhance recovery-oriented practices.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementing an Advance Choice Documents resource for Black African and Caribbean people with experience of compulsory psychiatric admission 96%
- A qualitative meta-synthesis of service users’ and carers’ experiences of assessment and involuntary hospital admissions under mental health legislations: a five-year update 95%
- A scoping review of trauma informed approaches in acute, crisis, emergency and residential mental health care 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Capturing the experiences of UK healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A structural topic modelling analysis of 7,412 free-text survey responses 95%
- The Benefits and Harms of Open Notes in Mental Health: A Delphi Survey of International Experts 95%
- A mixed-methods multi-site case study of a person-centred intervention for constant observation in hospitals with people living with dementia 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementation strategies for telemental health: a systematic review 95%
- A qualitative investigation of crisis cafés in England: their role, implementation, and accessibility 95%
- ‘Beyond Places of Safety’ – a qualitative study exploring the implementation of mental health crisis care innovations across England 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Recovery from severe mental health problems: A systematic review of service user and informal caregiver perspectives 94%
- Applications of Large Language Models in Psychiatry: A Systematic Review 94%
- Business as Un-usual: Access to mental health and primary care services for people with severe mental illness during the COVID-19 restrictions 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Safe clinical practice for patients hospitalised in mental health wards during a suicidal crisis: a qualitative study of patient experiences 96%
- The psychosocial impact on frontline health and social care professionals in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study 94%
- Performance of the Safer Nursing Care Tool to measure nurse staffing requirements in acute hospitals: a multi-centre observational study 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.