Design of a Behavioural Risk Monitoring Tool (RutiSafeNet) in an Acute Inpatient Mental Health Unit with Open-Doors Policy: A Qualitative Study
Miro-Mezquita, L.; Moreno-Orea, A.; de Pablo-Rabasso, J.; Martinez-Segura, M. I.; Delgado-Mari, M.; Castro-Anso, S.; Jimenez-Murcia, M.; Ibanez-Caparros, A.; Bustos-Cardona, T.; Cuevas-Esteban, J.
Show abstract
IntroductionOpen-door policies for acute inpatient mental health units (AIMHU) have shown promising results in reducing coercive measures, but concerns remain among patients and staff regarding increased workload, constant surveillance, and potential safety risks associated with these policies. ObjectivesThis study aims to develop a monitoring tool to facilitate safety management in AIMHUs by monitoring behavioural risks and nursing workload. MethodsThis study employed a qualitative approach using the content analysis method. Data were collected through three in-depth interviews and two focus groups involving staff (n=19) from the AIMHU of the hospital. Results34 items were identified to define behavioural risks related to self-harm and suicide, aggressiveness, and absconding, alongside factors affecting nursing workload. These items were categorised into three levels of risk: low, moderate, and high. ConclusionsThe result is a risk monitoring tool based on observational items for daily use in AIMHU that can help to reduce the uncertainty about risk management, especially in open-door units. This innovative tool enables individualized patient monitoring, provides insights into the units status, prioritizes conflict prevention, and upholds the human rights of patients.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Ethical and psychosocial considerations for hospital personnel in the Covid-19 crisis: Moral injury and resilience 96%
- Stressors, Manifestations and Course of COVID-19 Related Distress Among Nurses and Midwives in Tasmania 96%
- Capturing the experiences of UK healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A structural topic modelling analysis of 7,412 free-text survey responses 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A scoping review of trauma informed approaches in acute, crisis, emergency and residential mental health care 95%
- A qualitative meta-synthesis of service users’ and carers’ experiences of assessment and involuntary hospital admissions under mental health legislations: a five-year update 95%
- Implementing an Advance Choice Documents resource for Black African and Caribbean people with experience of compulsory psychiatric admission 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Recovery from severe mental health problems: A systematic review of service user and informal caregiver perspectives 95%
- Attitude towards Mental Help-Seeking, Motivation, and Economic Resources in Connection with Positive, Negative, and General Psychopathological Symptoms of Schizophrenia: A Pilot Study of a Psychoeducation Program 93%
- Business as Un-usual: Access to mental health and primary care services for people with severe mental illness during the COVID-19 restrictions 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Safe clinical practice for patients hospitalised in mental health wards during a suicidal crisis: a qualitative study of patient experiences 96%
- Performance of the Safer Nursing Care Tool to measure nurse staffing requirements in acute hospitals: a multi-centre observational study 95%
- Occupational challenges of health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. A qualitative study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Subjective mental health and need for care among psychiatric outpatients during the COVID-19 pandemic: results from an outreach initiative in Sweden 92%
- The prevalence, incidence and risk factors of mental health problems and mental health services use before and 9 months after the COVID-19 outbreak among the general Dutch population. A 3-wave prospective study 92%
- Development, validation and clinical utility of Short-term AdVerse-effects of Electroconvulsive therapy (SAVE) Checklist 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.