Back

Discriminating Inflammation from Malignancy with Short-Dynamic Patlak Parametric 18F-FDG PET/CT

Jandric, J.; Leonardi, L.; Barisonzi, R.; Zanca, R.; Vallone, C.; Rodari, M.; Evangelista, L.; Artesani, A.

2025-10-02 radiology and imaging
10.1101/2025.09.30.25336991 medRxiv
Show abstract

Aim/IntroductionDifferentiating malignant from inflammatory uptake on 18F-FDG PET/CT remains a major diagnostic challenge, as standardized uptake value (SUV) lacks specificity. Dynamic acquisitions with Patlak analysis can separate metabolized from unmetabolized tracer, potentially improving discrimination. We evaluated whether short-duration dynamic FDG PET/CT with Patlak parametric imaging provides complementary information beyond SUV for distinguishing malignancy from inflammation. Materials and MethodsTwenty-seven patients undergoing oncologic PET/CT (breast, lung, or gastrointestinal cancer) were included, yielding 96 lesions (69 malignant, 27 inflammatory). Short dynamic acquisitions (20 min) were motion-corrected and analysed to generate influx rate (Ki) and distribution volume (Vd) maps. Lesions were segmented on SUV images (40% SUVmax), and radiomic features were extracted from SUV, Ki, and Vd maps. Exploratory data analysis, linear modelling, and dimensionality reduction assessed separability. A Random Forest classifier was trained with crossvalidation, integrating Synthetic Minority Oversampling (SMOTE) to address class imbalance. An independent validation cohort of 15 lesions (13 inflammatory, 2 malignant) was tested. ResultsMalignant lesions showed higher SUVmean (5.8 vs. 2.8 g/ml) and Ki (1.95 vs. 0.75 ml/min/100ml), whereas inflammatory lesions demonstrated higher Vd (44.7 vs. 35.1%). No single feature provided reliable thresholds. Logistic regression achieved 89% accuracy but suffered from quasi-separation, confirming limited linear discriminability. Random Forest classification yielded robust performance (cross-validated AUC-ROC 0.876; AUC-PR 0.948). With G-mean thresholding, inflammation was detected with high recall (0.93) but recall for malignancy was lower (0.74). Feature importance highlighted SUV and Ki variance, as well as Ki/ Vd ratios, as strongest predictors. In the external validation set, accuracy reached 0.80, with inflammation reliably identified (precision 0.85, recall 0.85). ConclusionShort dynamic Patlak imaging combined with machine learning improves the characterization of malignant versus inflammatory uptake beyond SUV alone. By decomposing FDG up-take into metabolized (Ki) and unmetabolized (Vd) fractions, this approach provides physiologically meaningful separation of tracer behaviour. While sensitivity for malignancy requires further optimization, our findings establish a reproducible framework for future more extensive research on clinical interpretation of parametric imaging in oncologic PET.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
36.3%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 7%
10.1%
3
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
5
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.6%
7
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
8
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
9
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
10
Photoacoustics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
11
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
12
Neuro-Oncology Advances
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
13
Physics in Medicine & Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
14
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
15
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
NMR in Biomedicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
17
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
18
Analytical Biochemistry
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
19
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
20
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
Radiotherapy and Oncology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
22
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
38 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
23
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%