16S rRNA gene and rpoB Nanopore Sequencing for Bacterial Detection and Identification in Clinical Samples
Bivand, J. M.; Sivertsen, A.; Gjerde Tellevik, M.; Saebo, O.; Patel, R.; Dyrhovden, R.; Kommedal, O.
Show abstract
Broad-range amplification and sequencing of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene directly from clinical samples can improve diagnosis of bacterial infections. Recent advances in the Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) third-generation sequencing platform, delivering sequencing accuracy exceeding 99%, makes it a possible option for this approach. However, even full-length 16S rRNA sequencing may lack resolution to distinguish closely related species, a problem exacerbated by the remaining ONT error rate. Here, we propose a strategy combining ONT sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene with a segment of the rpoB gene. We further developed a novel bioinformatics tool mitigating issues related to the ONT error rate, and also providing homology scores allowing for implementation of CLSI interpretive criteria. Using this approach, we investigated 25 abdominal abscess samples, with Illumina sequencing of the same genes as the comparator method. Our results showed that rpoB ONT sequencing provided species-level identification in 91.5% of detections, as compared to 68.9% with 16S rRNA ONT sequencing. However, 16S rRNA ONT sequencing showed the highest sensitivity detecting 84.0% of the total identifications as compared to 74.2% for rpoB. Together, 16S rRNA and rpoB ONT sequencing achieved a detection rate of 94.0%, with species-level identification in 87.7%. For both gene targets, ONT sequencing paralleled Illumina sequencing. Combining ONT sequencing with optimized bioinformatics processing, alongside the high sensitivity of 16S rRNA broad-range amplification and the improved taxonomic resolution of rpoB, enable accurate detection and identification of bacteria directly from clinical samples.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Rapid nanopore metagenomic sequencing and predictive susceptibility testing of positive blood cultures from intensive care patients with sepsis 96%
- rRNA Operon Improves Species-Level Classification of Bacteria and Microbial Community Analysis Compared to 16S rRNA 96%
- Nested PCR to optimize rpoB metabarcoding for low-concentration and host-associated bacterial DNA 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- The clinical utility of two high-throughput 16S rRNA gene sequencing workflows for taxonomic assignment of unidentifiable bacterial pathogens in MALDI-TOF MS 97%
- Accurate and Reproducible Whole-Genome Genotyping for Bacterial Genomic Surveillance with Nanopore Sequencing Data 95%
- Clinical Metagenomic Sequencing for Species Identification and Antimicrobial Resistance Prediction in Orthopaedic Device Infection 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Duplex real-time PCR assay for the simultaneous detection of Achromobacter xylosoxidans and Achromobacter spp. 97%
- Quantitative real-time PCR assay for the rapid identification of the multidrug-resistant bacterial pathogen Stenotrophomonas maltophilia 96%
- Benchmarking taxonomic classifiers with Illumina and Nanopore sequence data for clinical metagenomic diagnostic applications 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- GSR-DB: a manually curated and optimised taxonomical database for 16S rRNA amplicon analysis 96%
- Species level resolution of female bladder microbiota from 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing 96%
- Clade-specific long-read sequencing increases the accuracy and specificity of the gyrB phylogenetic marker gene 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.