Recording of Pharmacy First consultations in general practice records in England: an observational study of the service's first year using OpenSAFELY
Kingsley, V. J.; Wiedemann, M.; Wood, C.; Green, A.; Curtis, H. J.; Fisher, L.; Andrews, C. D.; Taylor, A. C.; Ashiru-Oredope, D.; Sonnex, K.; Allen, T.; Higgins, H.; Thornley, T.; Mays, N.; Glover, R. E.; Elliott, R. A.; Avery, A. J.; MacKenna, B.
Show abstract
BackgroundPharmacy First, a national community pharmacy service, launched in January 2024 to improve access to primary care for patients with minor conditions facing backlogs caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Pharmacies are required to share details about their consultations with general practices. We aimed to describe how and what clinical activity was recorded in general practice during the first year of the service. MethodsWith the approval of NHS England, we conducted a retrospective cohort study using OpenSAFELY-TPP including Pharmacy First consultations between 31 January 2024 and 30 January 2025. We described patient demographics, consultation trends, and the clinical conditions and medications coded with Pharmacy First consultations. ResultsA total of 402,165 Pharmacy First consultations were recorded for 340,710 patients from a general population of 26,142,380 registered patients in OpenSAFELY-TPP. Acute pharyngitis (28.9%) and uncomplicated urinary tract infection (28%) were the most frequently recorded conditions. By January 2025, 36.3% of recorded Pharmacy First consultations had a clinical condition, medication, or both. Females, younger adults and those living in more deprived areas were observed more often in Pharmacy First records compared to the general population. ConclusionIncreasing recording of the Pharmacy First community pharmacy service was observed in general practice records during its first year, particularly among younger and more deprived populations. However, variation in structured recording of consultation details may limit evaluation.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Variation in prescription duration for long term conditions: a cohort study in English NHS primary care using OpenPrescribing 96%
- OpenSAFELY NHS Service Restoration Observatory 1: describing trends and variation in primary care clinical activity for 23.3 million patients in England during the first wave of COVID-19 96%
- Development and validation of a modified Cambridge Multimorbidity Score for use with internationally recognized electronic health record clinical terms (SNOMED CT) 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Active vaccine safety surveillance via a scalable, integrated system in Australian pharmacies 93%
- A Rapid Realist Review of the Role of Community Pharmacy in the Public Health Response to COVID-19 92%
- Evaluation of the General Practice Pharmacist (GPP) intervention to optimise prescribing in Irish primary care: a non-randomised pilot study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Remote Covid Assessment in Primary Care (RECAP) risk prediction tool: derivation and real-world validation studies 92%
- COVID-19 collateral: Indirect acute effects of the pandemic on physical and mental health in the UK 92%
- An external validation of the QCovid risk prediction algorithm for risk of mortality from COVID-19 in adults: national validation cohort study in England 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Patient characteristics associated with clinically coded long COVID: an OpenSAFELY study using electronic health records 92%
- A mixed-methods evaluation of patients’ views on primary care multi-disciplinary teams in Scotland 90%
- Patients’ perspectives on ecologically sustainable healthcare in general practice 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Changes in dispensing of medicines proposed for re-purposing in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia 93%
- Non-medical prescribing policy in the United Kingdom National Health Service: systematic review and narrative synthesis 92%
- A qualitative exploration of barriers to efficient and effective Structured Medication Reviews in Primary Care: Findings from the DynAIRx study 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.