A medical algorithmic audit framework for evaluating the safety, equity, and quality of an AI Scribe tool in a paediatric developmental assessment clinic
McCradden, M. D.; Tng, S.; Jeyaseelan, D.; Leane, C.; Campbell, M.; Braund, T.; Earle-Bandaralage, L.; Ebrahimi, M.; Sharma, A.; Tang, J.
Show abstract
BackgroundAny tool that can reduce the administrative burden on healthcare providers while preserving safe, accountable and high-quality medical documentation is of immense value both to healthcare institutions and consumers. The key question we need to answer is whether a prospective tool can reduce these burdens while maintaining (and, ideally, elevating) quality documentation standards. The goal of this study is to establish whether a large language model (LLM)-based documentation assistive tool can maintain safe, high-quality documentation while reducing the time required to ensure high-quality clinical documentation in the Child Development Unit (CDU) at the Womens and Childrens Hospital (WCH). MethodsUsing an algorithmic audit framework developed specific to our context, we will compare clinician-written clinical notes to AI-generated notes produced in parallel to the standard of care (i.e., a silent or translational trial paradigm). We will compare the time required to review clinical documentation per the standard of care compared with the AI-supported workflow with consideration to the accuracy of the final documentation. Finally, we will qualitatively describe AI-generated notes and compare them to the current standard to identify specific areas where clinical guidelines (e.g., performance information, risk mitigation) would support appropriate clinical use. SignificanceThe contributions of our protocol are twofold. First, we close a key gap in the literature which has limited attention thus far to measuring the real-world clinical utility of AI Scribes. Second, we adapt an established framework for medical algorithmic auditing to the specific use case of LLM-enabled AI Scribes. Our multi-disciplinary research team comprising clinicians, consumers, Aboriginal Health representatives, and an ethicist is unique within this research field and will allow us to generate insights from these diverse perspectives that together can provide constructive guidance for clinicians using and testing AI Scribe tools.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Wellbeing Impact Study of High-Speed 2 (WISH2): Protocol for a mixed-methods examination of the impact of major transport infrastructure development on mental health and wellbeing 95%
- Process of Use of Evidence Products by Frontline Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Staff at the Facility Level in Ghana. 95%
- Cost savings in male circumcision post-operative care continuum in rural and urban South Africa: Evidence on the importance of initial counselling and daily SMS 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- ePOCT+ and the medAL-suite: Development of an electronic clinical decision support algorithm and digital platform for pediatric outpatients in low- and middle-income countries 94%
- The NASSS (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability) framework use over time: A scoping review 94%
- Impact of electronic medical records on healthcare delivery in Nigeria: A Review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ethnicity and COVID-19 outcomes among healthcare workers in the United Kingdom: UK-REACH ethico-legal research, qualitative research on healthcare workers’ experiences, and stakeholder engagement protocol 95%
- A collaborative maternity and newborn dashboard (CoMaND) for the COVID-19 pandemic: a protocol for timely, adaptive monitoring of perinatal outcomes in Melbourne, Australia 95%
- Cohort Profile: Born in Wales - a birth cohort with maternity, parental, and child data linkage for life course research in Wales, UK 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Scientific hypothesis generation process in clinical research: a secondary data analytic tool versus experience study protocol 93%
- The PUPPY Study - Protocol for a Longitudinal Mixed Methods Study Exploring Problems Coordinating and Accessing Primary Care for Attached and Unattached Patients Exacerbated During the COVID-19 Pandemic Year 92%
- Physiological and Psychological Effects of Parental Traditional Thai Massage on Children with Autism: A Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Connecting Artificial Intelligence and Primary Care Challenges: Findings from a Multi-Stakeholder Collaborative Consultation 95%
- Measures of socioeconomic advantage are not independent predictors of support for healthcare AI: subgroup analysis of a national Australian survey 92%
- Development of a customised data management system for a COVID-19-adapted colorectal cancer pathway 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.