Back

Segmentation-Guided Development of Visual Classification Criteria for Alzheimer's Disease

Peters, M. A.; Steinbart, D.; Hammers, A.; Heckemann, R. A.; Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative,

2025-09-30 radiology and imaging
10.1101/2025.09.29.25336750 medRxiv
Show abstract

Alzheimers disease (AD) causes progressive structural brain changes that precede clinical symptoms by years. Detecting these changes using structural MRI remains challenging, especially in early stages and when relying on visual interpretation alone. Automated semantic segmentation methods offer anatomical precision and objective measurements, but their outputs are rarely used to support human visual assessment. In this study, we explored whether such segmentation outputs can be used to guide a non-expert investigator in developing and applying interpretable diagnostic criteria. We used images from the Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) and implemented a structured, segmentation-informed workflow in which a novice with no prior training in radiology or neuroanatomy developed classification rules based on visual appearance and volumetric readouts through three guided pilot phases. In a fourth phase, the investigator applied these criteria to an independent subset of ADNI images while blinded to the respective ADNI participants diagnostic labels. Using an anatomical segmentation model (MAPER) with training data from a pre-release version of the Hammers Adult Brain Atlas Database (120 brain regions), the investigator focused on the piriform cortex (PC). The choice of PC was context-driven, reflecting an ongoing quantitative study of PC volume. A binary classification (AD-like versus CN-like) rule based on PC volume (< or > 430 mm3), supported by assessments of PC shape and global atrophy, yielded an accuracy of 0.71 across 200 cases spanning four diagnostic groups. Accuracy increased to 0.77 when the analysis was restricted to CN and AD cases (with intermediate pathology (MCI) excluded). These results show that segmentation-guided visual workflows can enable non-experts to apply anatomically grounded classification criteria with moderate accuracy. Our framework can be expanded to other regions and promises to be useful for generating interpretable models, for supporting explainable AI, and for accelerating the acquisition of diagnostic skills.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.4%
2
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
11.9%
3
NeuroImage: Clinical
144 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.5%
4
Brain Informatics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
5
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
57 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.0%
6
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.0%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 30%
3.4%
50% of probability mass above
8
Brain Communications
166 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
9
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.6%
10
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.4%
11
Aperture Neuro
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
12
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 45%
1.7%
13
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
48 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
14
Alzheimer's & Dementia
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
16
NeuroImage: Reports
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
17
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
18
Frontiers in Neuroimaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
19
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
20
European Radiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
21
Frontiers in Digital Health
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
22
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
23
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
24
Brain and Behavior
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
25
Neurobiology of Aging
107 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
27
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
20 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%
28
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
29
Brain Research Bulletin
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
30
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
41 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%