Back

A Novel Method for the Mechanical Testing of Human Cerebrovascular Tissue: A Validation Study

Davison, M. A.; McCune, M.; Thiyagarajah, N.; Thomeer, D.; Rashidi, K.; Rashidi, M.; Moore, N. Z.

2025-09-30 bioengineering
10.1101/2025.09.28.679090 bioRxiv
Show abstract

This study describes and validates a novel mechanical testing apparatus capable of generating a viscoelastic response from which the time-dependent behavior of human cerebrovascular tissue can be derived to inform vessel wall failure prediction and therapeutic device design. Testing involved vascular specimen cannulation, pressurization, and recording dynamic changes in vessel diameter using a three-axis laser micrometer. Device validity and versatility were evaluated via two synthetic microvessel specimen experiments: (I) comparison to an Instron stress-relaxation protocol, and (II) vessel segment length parametric analysis. A standard linear solid (SLS) model was chosen to fit the experimental results, from which the model coefficients (E1, E2, and ) and equilibrium modulus (Ge) were computed. Ge comparisons were made using Bland-Altman analysis and Welchs F-test for experiment I and II, respectively. Device feasibility was evaluated through testing human cadaveric cerebrovascular tissue. The SLS model provided accurate experimental data fits, with overall mean R2 value of 0.99 (SD= 2.4E-3). Ge for inflation-creep and Instron stress-relaxation experiments were statistically comparable, with Bland-Altman mean bias of 1.9% (95% CI: -0.9% - 4.6%, p=.18). Holistically, the vessel segment length parametric analysis revealed inconsistent values for Ge across the complete range of testing lengths, where ad hoc family-wise comparison indicated that the 0.5 cm length cohort was the singular outlier (p < .05). Our device successfully recorded a viscoelastic response from human cadaveric middle cerebral artery tissue (n=12). This study demonstrated that our novel device was both versatile and capable of eliciting an accurate viscoelastic response.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.9%
2
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.4%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.6%
4
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.6%
5
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 22%
5.0%
7
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
8
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
9
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
10
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
11
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
12
Biomaterials
78 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
13
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
14
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
15
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
16
Journal of Biomedical Optics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
17
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
18
Biofabrication
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
19
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
20
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
21
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
22
Physics of Fluids
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
23
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Advanced Materials Technologies
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
25
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
28
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
29
Photoacoustics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
30
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.7%