Back

Trends and Outcomes of Carotid Revascularization for ACAS in ESKD Patients on Dialysis from 2010-2019

Ramani, G.; Chan, W.-C.; Ali, Z.; Patel, K. N.; Majmundar, M.; Vasudeva, R.; Gadre, A.; Munguti, C. M.; Munshi, K.; Thors, A.; DeCamp, S.; Gupta, K.; Parmar, G. M.

2025-10-01 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2025.09.28.25336858 medRxiv
Show abstract

INTRODUCTIONThe role of carotid revascularization for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (ACAS) in dialysis-dependent end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients remains poorly defined, as these patients have high periprocedural risks and limited long-term survival. This study evaluated the trends in carotid revascularization in this group and studied associated short- and long-term outcomes. METHODSWe analyzed the United States Renal Data System (USRDS) to study dialysis-dependent ESKD patients with ACAS who underwent carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid artery stenosis (CAS) between 2010 and 2019. Primary outcomes included trends in CEA and CAS utilization, 30-day stroke or death rates. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital and one-year stroke or death rates. RESULTSAmong 11,405 ESKD patients on dialysis with ACAS, 4954 underwent carotid revascularization (4098 CEA; 856 CAS). CEA rates reduced by 55% and CAS by 50% between 2010 and 2019. CAS was associated with a higher 30-day composite stroke or death rate (7.13% vs 4.5%; P=0.0014), in-hospital stroke or death rate (3.39% vs 2.22%, P=0.0433), and 1-year stroke or death rate (33.1% vs 25.4%, P<0.001) compared to CEA. No significant improvements in the outcomes over time were observed. CONCLUSIONCarotid revascularization rates for ACAS have declined among dialysis-dependent ESKD patients, yet both CEA and CAS are associated with significant procedure-related stroke and death risk. These support a cautious approach and underscore the need for a more selective and individualized shared decision-making approach in this high-risk population.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Kidney360
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
29.1%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 16%
11.0%
3
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.7%
4
BMC Nephrology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
50% of probability mass above
5
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.1%
6
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.8%
7
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
52 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.2%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.2%
9
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
10
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
11
International Journal of Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
12
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
13
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
14
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
15
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
16
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
17
Diabetologia
36 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
18
Hypertension
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
19
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
20
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
21
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
23
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
24
Kidney International Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
25
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
27
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
28
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
29
Canadian Medical Association Journal
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%