Back

Multimodal Assessment of Peripheral Perfusion for the Early Diagnosis of Sepsis in Critically Ill Patients (MAP-SEPS): A Protocol for an Observational Study

Chalkias, A.; Thivaios, I.; Karapiperis, G.; Papagiannakis, N.; Koufaki, F.; Katsifa, K.; Prekates, A.; Tselioti, P.

2025-09-29 intensive care and critical care medicine
10.1101/2025.09.28.25336825 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionSepsis-induced organ failure is caused by a dysregulated host response characterized by mitochondrial and microcirculatory abnormalities. Early detection of perfusion deficits is critical to preventing progression to shock and organ failure. While capillary refill time (CRT) and other single-parameter assessments are used, a comprehensive, multimodal evaluation of peripheral perfusion has not yet been applied in clinical settings. The purpose of the MAP-SEPS trial is to ascertain whether such a multimodal approach can enhance early identification of sepsis and organ dysfunction in critically ill ICU patients. Methods and analysisMAP-SEPS is a prospective observational study enrolling a minimum of 50 adult ICU patients without sepsis on admission. Patients will be monitored over 72 hours using a multimodal protocol that includes clinical (CRT, skin temperature, mottling score, urine output), biochemical (lactate, ScvO{square}, Pv- aCO{square}, arterial/interstitial glucose), and near-infrared spectroscopy assessments. Standardized macrohemodynamic monitoring and echocardiography will be performed, along with advanced calculations of venous return dynamics, cardiac efficiency, and arterial/venous resistance. Data will be collected at predefined intervals and analyzed using mixed-effects linear regression models. The primary objective is to assess the predictive value of these hemodynamic and perfusion parameters for early detection of sepsis and organ failure. Secondary outcomes include ICU and hospital length of stay, mechanical ventilation duration, and mortality at 28 and 90 days. Ethics and disseminationThe study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the General Hospital Tzaneio and complies with the Declaration of Helsinki. Peer-reviewed papers, conference presentations, and clinical seminars will all be used to disseminate the findings, contributing to better bedside evaluation techniques for septic patients.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
19.1%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 12%
15.1%
3
Critical Care
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.0%
4
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.7%
50% of probability mass above
5
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.5%
6
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
5.0%
7
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.1%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.4%
9
Neurocritical Care
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
10
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
11
Pediatric Research
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
12
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
13
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
14
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
15
American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
16
Journal of Neurotrauma
27 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
17
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
Physiological Measurement
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
20
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
21
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
22
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
23
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
24
International Journal of Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
25
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
26
Clinical Immunology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
27
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.5%