Evaluating the Impact of Financial and Operating Costs on Service Delivery Efficiency in Integrated Care Boards (ICBs) in the UK: A Data Envelopment Analysis and Regression Approach
Achori, E.
Show abstract
This research investigates the effects of financial and operating costs and service delivery efficiency within selected Integrated Care Boards (ICBs) in the UK. Utilising a comprehensive dataset, the study employs both regression analysis and Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to evaluate the impact of key independent variables of staff cost, efficiency savings, liquidity ratio, interest on lease liabilities, population size, fund, staff turnover, estate investment level, and right-of-use assets on two critical dependent variables (patient waiting time and operating surplus/deficit). The regression analysis reveals significant effects, highlighting the positive impact of population size and staff turnover on patient waiting times, and the positive correlation between right-of-use assets and operating surplus. Conversely, efficiency savings and increased funding are found to significantly reduce patient waiting times. The DEA identifies variations in efficiency across different ICBs, pinpointing those operating on the efficiency frontier and those with room for improvement. The findings offer valuable insights for policymakers and healthcare managers aiming to optimise resource allocation, enhance operational efficiency, and ultimately improve patient outcomes within the evolving landscape of integrated care in the UK.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Systematic Review: The Dimensions and Indicators utilized in the Performance Evaluation of Health Care Organizations- An Implication during COVID-19 Pandemic 94%
- The Impact for implementing Balanced Scorecard in Health Care Organizations: A Systematic Review 94%
- ‘Leading from the front’ implementation strategies increase the success of influenza vaccination drives among healthcare workers: A reanalysis of Systematic Review evidence using Intervention Component Analysis (ICA) and Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Essential Indicators of Quality in Primary Care Settings: An Evidence-Based, Structured, Expert Approach 93%
- Process of Use of Evidence Products by Frontline Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Staff at the Facility Level in Ghana. 93%
- Adapting for the COVID-19 pandemic in Ecuador, a characterization of hospital strategies and patients 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Conceptualizing centers of excellence: A global evidence 94%
- A conceptual model for pluralistic healthcare behavior: results from a qualitative study in southwestern Uganda 94%
- The preparedness and response to COVID-19 in a quaternary Intensive Care Unit in Australia: perspectives and insights from frontline critical care clinicians 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A novel methodology to measure waiting times for community-based specialist care in a public healthcare system 92%
- The Amortization of Funding Gene Therapies: Making the “Intangibles” Tangible for Patients 92%
- Understanding the influence of leadership, organisation, and policy on delivering an integrated child health and social care service in community settings: A qualitative exploration using the SELFIE framework 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving the impact of pharmacy interventions in hospitals 93%
- Improving local authority financial support services for users with complex health needs: a mixed-method economic evaluation of Social Navigators in South Tyneside, UK 92%
- National statutory reporting: not even ticking the boxes? The quality of ‘Learning from Deaths’ reporting in Quality Accounts within the NHS in England 2017-2020 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.