Back

Design and optimisation of rapid real-time PCR assays for the detection of key Culicoides species

Isiye, E.; Valcarcel Olmeda, A.; Curran, T.; O'Neill, D.; De Waal, T.; Barry, G.; O'Hanlon, A.; O'Shaughnessy, J.; England, M.; Zintl, A.; O'Meara, D.

2025-09-28 molecular biology
10.1101/2025.09.26.678746 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In extensive surveillance programmes of Culicoides biting midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae), morphological identification can be time-consuming and difficult, while DNA barcoding, although highly accurate, may not be cost-effective or suitable for rapid analysis, as it requires individual specimen processing. To address these limitations, we developed a rapid screening method using real-time PCR assays with either SYBR Green or hydrolysis probe-based detection chemistries. Species-specific primers and, where necessary, hydrolysis probes were designed based on the updated sequences of the ITS2 region of seven Culicoides species. The specificity and efficiency of these assays were validated both in silico and through real-time PCR testing on target and non-target Culicoides species, tested individually and as mixed-species samples. The new real-time PCR assays detect vector species including C. obsoletus, C. scoticus, C. chiopterus, C. dewulfi, C. pulicaris, C. punctatus, and C. impunctatus in pools of individual specimens, with single-specimen sensitivity. The molecular techniques developed in this study provide a valuable tool for accurate and high-throughput Culicoides surveillance, which can be used for year-round monitoring of adult midges in traps and larvae in environmental samples, potentially revealing novel insights into the spatial and temporal turnover of Culicoides species. These methods can be applied to large-scale vector screening programmes involving pooled samples, addressing the limitations of previously described methods used in midge surveillance.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Parasites & Vectors
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
40.7%
2
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 1%
8.7%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.1%
5
Acta Tropica
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
6
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.7%
7
Journal of Medical Entomology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.2%
8
Medical and Veterinary Entomology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
9
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
10
Malaria Journal
48 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.5%
12
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
13
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.3%
14
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
15
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
16
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
17
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%
18
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
19
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
20
Journal of Microbiological Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
21
Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
22
Journal of Economic Entomology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
23
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%