Economic burden of Melanoma in Oregon to Inform State-wide Early Detection initiatives, The War on Melanoma
Cho, J.-Y.; Nelson, J. H.; Ng, J.; Petrie, T.; Diehl, K.; Stoos, E.; Chaiyakunapruk, N.; Leachman, S. A.
Show abstract
Melanoma imposes substantial clinical and financial burdens, particularly in advanced stages where systemic therapies are increasingly utilized. To establish a baseline for evaluating the statewide War on Melanoma (WoM) early detection initiative, we analyzed stage-specific melanoma expenditures in Oregon from 2011-2021 using a novel pseudostaging algorithm applied to the Oregon All Payer All Claims (APAC) database. The algorithm classified cases into early (in situ/localized), regional, and distant stages based on diagnostic, procedural, and treatment codes and was validated against SEER-Medicare claims and chart review. Over the study period, the number of melanoma cases in claims rose steadily, and total annual expenditures tripled, driven primarily by late-stage disease. Expenditures for early-stage melanoma remained relatively stable, while costs for regional and distant stages increased sharply with the adoption of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies. These findings provide the first comprehensive, claims-based baseline of stage-specific melanoma costs in Oregon and highlight the disproportionate economic burden of advanced disease. Establishing such baselines is critical for evaluating population-level initiatives like WoM and for assessing the potential economic benefits of earlier detection and treatment. SummaryO_LIWe quantified the stage-specific economic burden of melanoma in Oregon using a pseudostaging algorithm applied to statewide claims data, demonstrating sharp increases in cost, particularly in advanced disease. C_LIO_LIThese estimates provide essential baseline evidence for evaluating the War on Melanoma, a statewide initiative designed to promote earlier detection and reduce the need for costly late-stage treatment. C_LIO_LIThe reproducible claims-based approach offers a scalable framework for other states and health systems to assess the value of cancer prevention and early detection initiatives. C_LI SignificanceWe establish stage-specific costs of melanoma in Oregon using a validated claims-based pseudostaging algorithm. The results highlight the disproportionate financial burden of advanced disease and provide essential context for the War on Melanoma, a statewide early detection initiative. These baseline estimates enable rigorous evaluation of whether shifting toward earlier-stage diagnosis can reduce healthcare costs and improve patient outcomes, offering a framework relevant to other states and cancer prevention programs.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Inhibition of the Rho/MRTF pathway improves the response of BRAF-resistant melanoma to PD1/PDL1 blockade 88%
- Predicted long-term impact of COVID-19 pandemic-related care delays on cancer incidence and mortality in Canada 88%
- Inequalities in relative cancer survival by race, immigration status, income, and education for 22 cancer sites in Canada, a cohort study 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Matched three-dimensional organoids and two-dimensional cell lines of melanoma brain metastases mirror response to targeted molecular therapy 91%
- Explainable machine learning identifies features and thresholds predictive of immunotherapy response 90%
- Disparities in outcomes among patients diagnosed with cancer associated with emergency department visits 89%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Reconstructed human pigmented skin/epidermis models achieve epidermal pigmentation through melanocore transfer. 87%
- Melanocortin-1 receptor (MC1R) genotypes do not correlate with size in two cohorts of medium-to-giant congenital melanocytic nevi 87%
- The OSUMMER lines: a series of ultraviolet-accelerated NRAS-mutant mouse melanoma cell lines syngeneic to C57BL/6 87%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.