Back

Surgery-related obstetric fistulas across health facilities in sub-Saharan African countries: systematic review and meta-analysis

Imakando, M. M.; Maya, E.; Owiredu, D.; Monde, M. W.; Jacobs, C.; Akuffo, K. O.; Fwemba, I.; Danso-Appiah, A.

2025-09-29 public and global health
10.1101/2025.09.25.25336674 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundSurgery-related (iatrogenic) obstetric fistulas are a major public health threat in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), but the actual burden is largely unknown due to a paucity of data. This review aimed to collate empirical evidence on the magnitude and determinants of iatrogenic obstetric fistulas in SSA. MethodsPubMed, LILACS, CINAHL, SCOPUS and Google Scholar were searched from 1st January 2000 to 31st March 2025, without language restrictions, via comprehensive search terms. The Cochrane Library, African Journals Online, Data Base of African Thesis and Dissertations, including Research (DATAD-R D Space), Preprint Repositories and reference lists of relevant studies, were also searched. The retrieved studies were deduplicated in Endnote, screened and selected in Rayyan. Two authors independently selected studies, extracted data and assessed the quality of the included studies via pretested tools. Disagreements between reviewers were resolved through discussion. Weighted proportions were estimated via STATA SE 18. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed graphically and statistically, and where significant, random effects model meta-analysis was performed. Estimates are reported with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analysis was conducted to address heterogeneity, and sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of the pooled estimates. ResultsThe proportion of surgery-related obstetric fistulas among urogenital/rectovaginal fistulas in SSA is 40% (95% CI 34-47, 60 studies, n=25825), whereas among obstetric fistulas, it is 44% (95% CI 37-51, 55 studies, n=17504). The procedures that frequently preceded obstetric fistulas were as follows: caesarean section (34%, 95% CI 28-40; 54 studies, n=17491) and instrumental vaginal deliveries (11%, 95% CI 9-13; 34 studies, n=12727). Most procedures that resulted in obstetric fistulas were performed by nonspecialists (92%, 3 studies, n=749). ConclusionsThe proportions of iatrogenic obstetric fistulas among urogenital/rectovaginal fistulas (40%) and obstetric fistulas (44%) are high and raise serious concerns about the quality of obstetric surgical care delivery in SSA. The fact that more than 92% of obstetric surgeries are performed by nonspecialists and that the incidence of iatrogenic fistulas is high calls for increased efforts towards capacity building and quality improvement across countries in SSA. RegistrationThe protocol for this systematic review was registered in the International Prospective Register for Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) with registration ID: CRD42021277993.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 4%
26.9%
2
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
7.1%
3
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.0%
4
Journal of Global Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
5
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.5%
6
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
8
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
9
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
10
Tropical Medicine & International Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.8%
12
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
17
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
18
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
21
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Public Health in Practice
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
23
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.8%
24
Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
26
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
27
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
28
The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
29
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
30
Archives of Public Health
12 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.5%