Back

Gender-Based Analysis of PTSD in Addiction

Katir, I.; Korchi, A.; Zarouf, H.; Belbachir, S.; Sabir, M.; Ouanass, A.

2025-09-28 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2025.09.25.25336653 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPost-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) affects 8-10% of trauma-exposed individuals globally (2), with significant gender disparities in prevalence and clinicalpresentation. The relationship between PTSD and substance use disorders creates complex comorbidity patterns requiring gender-sensitive approaches. ObjectiveTo examine gender-specific differences in PTSD symptom expression and addiction patterns among patients in addiction treatment settings. MethodsCross-sectional epidemiological study with retrospective components examining 30 participants (60% women, 40% men) aged 18 and above with confirmed PTSD diagnoses and comorbid addictive disorders. Standardized questionnaires including PCL-5 assessments were combined with systematic medical record analysis over eight months. Statistical analyses employed Mann-Whitney U tests, Chi-square tests, and logistic regression models. ResultsWomen demonstrated higher PCL-5 total scores (56.3 vs 52.6) and greater intrusive symptoms (17.0 vs 14.8). Cannabis emerged as the primary self-medication substance (26.7% of sample), with 60% of users employing it for trauma-related symptoms. Women showed higher rates of cannabis use for trauma (70% of cannabis users), while men demonstrated greater stimulant use (70% of stimulant users). Psychiatric antecedents were prevalent (87%) with significant association to elevated PCL-5 scores (p < 0.05). ConclusionsDistinct gender-specific patterns emerged in trauma response and addiction behaviors. Women demonstrated internalized symptom presentations with higher intrusive symptoms, while men showed externalized patterns with greater symptom variability. These findings support the need for gender-sensitive screening and integrated treatment approaches in addiction settings.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.