Back

Trends and inequalities in Advice and Guidance versus direct referral in NHS primary care

Mason, K. J.; Jordan, K. P.; Bailey, J.; Bajpai, R.; Clarson, L. E.; Faux-Nightingale, A.; Hadley-Barrows, T.; Haines, J. K.; Harrison, R.; Helliwell, T.; Hider, S. L.; Jinks, C.; Knight, N.; Mallen, C. D.; Welsh, V. K.; Burton, C.

2025-09-27 primary care research
10.1101/2025.09.25.25336644 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objectiveto examine trends and variation in the use of Advice and Guidance (A&G) compared with direct referrals in primary care, and to assess potential disparities across population groups. DesignObservational study using routinely collected electronic health records SettingClinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Aurum, 2015-2023. Main Outcome Measuresannual prevalence of A&G and direct referrals, stratified by age, gender, deprivation, locality, and ethnicity. Mapping of clinical codes was used to determine target specialities for A&G. The proportion of individuals recorded with A&G and a direct referral within {+/-}4 months was calculated. ResultsBetween 2015-2023, 671,894 patients (4%; 59% female) had A&G recorded and 9.7 million (59%; 46% female) had a direct referral. A&G use increased 19-fold from (0.10% to 1.97%), doubling between 2019 and 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic. Direct referral rates fell from 23%-25% pre-pandemic to 18% in 2020 before recovering to 24% by 2023. Cardiology (21%), Dermatology (7%) and Ear, Nose and Throat (5%) were the most common specialties linked to A&G. Most patients receiving A&G (86%) also had a direct referral within {+/-}4 months. Inequities were evident: A&G use was higher among older, white, and less deprived patients, while minority ethnic and more deprived groups had slower recovery of direct referral rates post-pandemic. ConclusionA&G use has increased substantially since 2015, accelerated by the pandemic and maintained after, but has not displaced direct referrals. Instead, direct referral often precedes A&G, raising questions about efficiency and equity. The system appears to benefit older, white, and less deprived individuals while minority ethnic and more deprived groups remain disadvantaged. Policy should prioritise addressing these disparities and evaluate whether A&G reduces unnecessary referrals or delays access to specialist care. What is already known on this topic- Advice & Guidance (A&G) was introduced to support outpatient reform and manage NHS waiting lists. - Evidence on its usage patterns and equity across patient groups is limited. What this study adds- A&G use increased 19-fold between 2015 and 2023, particularly post-pandemic. - Disparities were identified with higher uptake in older, white and less deprived groups. - Direct referrals have recovered to pre-pandemic levels, suggesting A&G is not replacing traditional pathways.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.5%
2
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.5%
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 2%
10.1%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.8%
5
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
6
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.2%
7
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
8
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
9
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
10
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
11
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
12
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
13
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
14
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
15
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
16
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
17
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
18
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
19
Preventive Medicine Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
20
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
21
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%