Trends and inequalities in Advice and Guidance versus direct referral in NHS primary care
Mason, K. J.; Jordan, K. P.; Bailey, J.; Bajpai, R.; Clarson, L. E.; Faux-Nightingale, A.; Hadley-Barrows, T.; Haines, J. K.; Harrison, R.; Helliwell, T.; Hider, S. L.; Jinks, C.; Knight, N.; Mallen, C. D.; Welsh, V. K.; Burton, C.
Show abstract
Objectiveto examine trends and variation in the use of Advice and Guidance (A&G) compared with direct referrals in primary care, and to assess potential disparities across population groups. DesignObservational study using routinely collected electronic health records SettingClinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Aurum, 2015-2023. Main Outcome Measuresannual prevalence of A&G and direct referrals, stratified by age, gender, deprivation, locality, and ethnicity. Mapping of clinical codes was used to determine target specialities for A&G. The proportion of individuals recorded with A&G and a direct referral within {+/-}4 months was calculated. ResultsBetween 2015-2023, 671,894 patients (4%; 59% female) had A&G recorded and 9.7 million (59%; 46% female) had a direct referral. A&G use increased 19-fold from (0.10% to 1.97%), doubling between 2019 and 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic. Direct referral rates fell from 23%-25% pre-pandemic to 18% in 2020 before recovering to 24% by 2023. Cardiology (21%), Dermatology (7%) and Ear, Nose and Throat (5%) were the most common specialties linked to A&G. Most patients receiving A&G (86%) also had a direct referral within {+/-}4 months. Inequities were evident: A&G use was higher among older, white, and less deprived patients, while minority ethnic and more deprived groups had slower recovery of direct referral rates post-pandemic. ConclusionA&G use has increased substantially since 2015, accelerated by the pandemic and maintained after, but has not displaced direct referrals. Instead, direct referral often precedes A&G, raising questions about efficiency and equity. The system appears to benefit older, white, and less deprived individuals while minority ethnic and more deprived groups remain disadvantaged. Policy should prioritise addressing these disparities and evaluate whether A&G reduces unnecessary referrals or delays access to specialist care. What is already known on this topic- Advice & Guidance (A&G) was introduced to support outpatient reform and manage NHS waiting lists. - Evidence on its usage patterns and equity across patient groups is limited. What this study adds- A&G use increased 19-fold between 2015 and 2023, particularly post-pandemic. - Disparities were identified with higher uptake in older, white and less deprived groups. - Direct referrals have recovered to pre-pandemic levels, suggesting A&G is not replacing traditional pathways.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Changes in General Practice use and costs with COVID-19 and telehealth initiatives 96%
- OpenSAFELY NHS Service Restoration Observatory 1: describing trends and variation in primary care clinical activity for 23.3 million patients in England during the first wave of COVID-19 95%
- Primary care transformation in Scotland: a comparison two cross-sectional national surveys of general practitioners’ views in 2018 and 2023 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- What is the suitability of clinical vignettes in benchmarking the performance of online symptom checkers? An audit study 94%
- Identifying markers of health-seeking behaviour and healthcare access in UK electronic health records 93%
- Trends in inequalities in avoidable hospitalisations across the COVID-19 pandemic: A cohort study of 23.5 million people in England 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A mixed-methods evaluation of patients’ views on primary care multi-disciplinary teams in Scotland 95%
- Integrating primary care and social services for older adults with multimorbidity: A qualitative study 93%
- Patient characteristics associated with clinically coded long COVID: an OpenSAFELY study using electronic health records 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Understanding the influence of leadership, organisation, and policy on delivering an integrated child health and social care service in community settings: A qualitative exploration using the SELFIE framework 92%
- Staff experiences and perspectives of delivering an integrated child health and social care service in community settings: A qualitative exploration using the SELFIE framework 92%
- Progressivity of out-of-pocket costs under Australia’s universal health care system: a national linked data study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Patterns of rates of mortality in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink 94%
- STIMULATE-ICP-CAREINEQUAL - Defining usual care and examining inequalities in Long Covid support: protocol for a mixed-methods study (part of STIMULATE-ICP: Symptoms, Trajectory, Inequalities and Management: Understanding Long-COVID to Address and Transform Existing Integrated Care Pathways) 94%
- Wellbeing Impact Study of High-Speed 2 (WISH2): Protocol for a mixed-methods examination of the impact of major transport infrastructure development on mental health and wellbeing 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.