Back

Comparison of Two National Noise Models: Progress Towards an Integrated Noise Model for Environmental Health Research in the United States

Huang, C.-H. S.; Seto, E.

2025-09-27 occupational and environmental health
10.1101/2025.09.23.25336495 medRxiv
Show abstract

Two sound level maps currently exist for the contiguous United States. One was developed by the National Park Service (NPS) using machine learning methods and sound pressure level monitoring data, and the other by the Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) using transportation noise models of roadway, aviation, and rail sources. Developed for different purposes, each has distinct strengths and weaknesses. This study aimed to compare the two models, develop a hybrid model integrating both, and evaluate its performance against field measurements. Linear regression with data from 378 NPS field sites was used to relate the NPS L50 metric to Leq. A positive association was observed, and the resulting regression equation was used to convert L50 to Leq. Comparing BTS 2018 and 2020 with the converted NPS model, we found strong correlation and small bias between BTS years (Pearsons r = 0.90, Spearmans rho = 0.88, bias = 0.3 dBA), but larger differences between BTS and NPS, with BTS levels on average [~]6 dBA higher. A hybrid model was created by filling censored BTS areas with converted NPS Leq values. Evaluation against 708 NPS measurements and 757 metropolitan measurements showed good performance (bias = 0.4 dBA, MAE = 5.0 dBA for NPS; bias = -0.5 dBA, MAE = 3.8 dBA for metropolitan sites). Using the hybrid model, we estimated that [~]36.4 million people (11.1% of the U.S. population) are exposed above 55 dB Leq. The hybrid model provides a resource to inform noise-related environmental health research, policy, and planning.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Remote Sensing
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.0%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 17%
11.3%
3
Environmental Health Perspectives
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.3%
4
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.1%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 9%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
Environment International
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
7
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
8
Environmental Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.3%
9
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
10
The Innovation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
11
Indoor Air
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
12
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.8%
13
Environmental Science & Technology Letters
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
14
Environmental Pollution
37 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
15
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.2%
16
Human Genomics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
17
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
18
Photochemistry and Photobiology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
19
American Journal of Infection Control
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
20
Chemosphere
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
21
Annals of the American Thoracic Society
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
22
Optics Express
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
23
Chemical Research in Toxicology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
24
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%