EpiCurveBench: Evaluating epidemic curve digitization
Berkane, T.; Majumder, M.
Show abstract
Accurate data on disease case counts over time is essential for training reliable disease forecasting models. However, such data is often locked in non-machine-readable formats, most commonly as epidemic curve (epicurve) images--charts that depict case counts of a given disease over time, for a given location. Digitizing these charts would greatly expand the data available for forecasting models, improving their accuracy. Manual digitization, though, is very time-consuming, and existing automated methods struggle with real-world epicurves due to dense datapoints, overlapping series, and varied visual styles. To address this, we present EpiCurveBench, a benchmark of 100 manually curated and annotated epicurve images collected from diverse sources. The dataset spans a wide range of chart styles, from simple to highly complex. We also introduce Epi-Curve Similarity (ECS), a new evaluation metric that captures the temporal structure of epicurves, handles series of varying lengths, and remains stable in the presence of incomplete data. Using this metric, we evaluate state-of-the-art chart data extraction methods on EpiCurveBench and find substantial room for improvement, with the best model achieving an ECS of only 42.9%. We release the dataset and evaluation pipeline to accelerate progress in epicurve extraction. More broadly, the difficulty of EpiCurveBench compared to existing chart extraction benchmarks provides a rigorous testbed for advancing chart data extraction methods beyond disease forecasting. Institutional Review Board (IRB)This research does not require IRB approval.
Matching journals
The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Uncovering the effects of model initialization on deep model generalization: A study with adult and pediatric chest X-ray images 91%
- Emulation of epidemics via Bluetooth-based virtual safe virus spread: experimental setup, software, and data 89%
- Evaluating Knowledge Fusion Models on Detecting Adverse Drug Events in Text 89%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.