Machine Learning-Based Meningioma Location Classification Using Vision Transformers and Transfer Learning
Bande, J. K.; Johnson, E. T.; Banderudrappagari, R.
Show abstract
PurposeIn this study, we aimed to use advanced machine learning (ML) techniques, specifically transfer learning and Vision Transformers (ViTs), to accurately classify meningioma in brain MRI scans. ViTs process images similarly to how humans visually perceive details and are useful for analyzing complex medical images. Transfer learning is a technique that uses models previously trained on large datasets and adapts them to specific use cases. Using transfer learning, this study aimed to enhance the diagnostic accuracy of meningioma location and demonstrate the capabilities the new technology. ApproachWe used a Google ViT model pre-trained on ImageNet-21k (a dataset with 14 million images and 21,843 classes) and fine-tuned on ImageNet 2012 (a dataset with 1 million images and 1,000 classes). Using this model, which was pre-trained and fine-tuned on large datasets of images, allowed us to leverage the predictive capabilities of the model trained on those large datasets without needing to train an entirely new model specific to only meningioma MRI scans. Transfer learning was used to adapt the pre-trained ViT to our specific use case, being meningioma location classification, using a dataset of 1,094 images of T1, contrast-enhanced, and T2-weighted MRI scans of meningiomas sorted according to location in the brain, with 11 different classes. ResultsThe final model trained and adapted on the meningioma MRI dataset achieved an average validation accuracy of 98.17% and a test accuracy of 89.95%. ConclusionsThis study demonstrates the potential of ViTs in meningioma location classification, leveraging their ability to analyze spatial relationships in medical images. While transfer learning enabled effective adaptation with limited data, class imbalance affected classification performance. Future work should focus on expanding datasets and incorporating ensemble learning to improve diagnostic reliability.
Matching journals
The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging-based Deep Learning Predictive Models of Brain Disorders: A Systematic Review of Modelling Practices, Transparency, and Interpretability 94%
- Deep Bayesian networks for uncertainty estimation and adversarial resistance of white matter hyperintensity segmentation 94%
- Towards an informed choice of diffusion MRI image contrasts for cerebellar segmentation 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated Tumor Segmentation and Brain Tissue Extraction from Multiparametric MRI of Pediatric Brain Tumors: A Multi-Institutional Study 95%
- Pediatric brain tumor classification using deep learning on MR-images with age fusion 94%
- Early prognostication of overall survival for pediatric diffuse midline gliomas using MRI radiomics and machine learning 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep neural networks allow expert-level brain meningioma detection, segmentation and improvement of current clinical practice 94%
- Developing a Fully Automated Imaging Biomarker for HCC Risk Assessment via MRI-Based Tumor Segmentation and EPM 93%
- Radius-Optimized Efficient Template Matching for Lesion Detection from Brain Images 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep Learning for Automatic Segmentation of Vestibular Schwannoma: A Retrospective Study from Multi-Centre Routine MRI 94%
- Super-Resolution of Magnetic Resonance Images Acquired Under Clinical Protocols using Deep Attention-based Method 93%
- Quantifying the Brain Predictivity of Artificial Neural Networks with Nonlinear Response Mapping 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.