Back

Echocardiographic assessment of elevated pulmonary vascular pressures after resolution of critical illness

Wodarcyk, A.; Folk, S.; McKnight, K.; O'Connor, B.; Visovatti, S. H.; Vanderpool, R. R.

2025-09-23 intensive care and critical care medicine
10.1101/2025.09.22.25336345 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPulmonary vascular pressures are freq[ABS]suently elevated in critically ill patients and are associated with worse outcomes. However, whether elevated pressures persist and their impact on outcomes after critical illness is unknown. Research QuestionsWhat factors asre associated with persistently elevated pulmonary vascular pressures? What are the outcomes associated with persistently elevated pulmonary vascular pressures? Study Design and MethodsThis is a single center retrospective cohort study of critically ill patients during the year 2021. Adult patients with a measured tricuspid regurgitant velocity[&ge;]2.8 m/s during critical illness and had a repeat echocardiogram done after hospital discharge were included. Kaplan Meier and logistic regression were used for mortality and multivariate analysis. ResultsOf 540 patients, 257 (47.6%) had an elevated TRV. Of 51 patients with a repeat echocardiogram, 33 (64.7%) had an elevated repeat TRV. These patients had higher heart rates (91{+/-}23 vs 73{+/-}14 bpm, p<0.01), lower hemoglobin levels (8.42{+/-}1.76 vs 10.0{+/-}2.16, p=0.02), decreased TAPSE (1.90 {+/-} 0.52 mm vs 2.23 {+/-} 0.43, p = 0.03), increased RV middle diameter(3.27{+/-}0.85 vs 2.72{+/-}0.78, p=0.04) and decreased left ventricular stroke volume (61.76{+/-}15.10 vs 84.36{+/-}27.09, p=0.01) compared to those with a normal repeat TRV. Hemoglobin (p=0.03, 95% CI: 0.30-0.90) and SVI (p=0.03, 95% CI: 0.77-0.98) were associated with elevated repeat TRV levels. Elevated TRV on repeat echocardiogram was not associated with worse survival (log-rank test, p=0.33). InterpretationElevated pulmonary vascular pressures persisted after critical illness in a large number of patients, although the impact of persistently elevated pulmonary vascular pressures is uncertain.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.7%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 11%
15.2%
3
Critical Care
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
4
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
Circulation: Heart Failure
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
6
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
7
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
8
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.1%
10
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
11
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
12
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
13
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
14
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
15
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.4%
16
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
17
American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology
38 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
18
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
19
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
20
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
21
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
22
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
24
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
Physiological Measurement
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
28
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
29
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%