Back

Neuromorphic Neuromodulation: A Low-Power Edge-Training Framework for the Future of Personalized and Closed-Loop Neurostimulation.

Herbozo Contreras, L. F.; Yu, L.; Huang, Z.; Aguilar, I.; Nikpour, A.; Kavehei, O.

2025-09-25 neurology
10.1101/2025.09.22.25336341 medRxiv
Show abstract

Epilepsy affects approximately 1% of the global population, with 30-40% of cases resistant to conventional pharmacological treatments. Current neurostimulation offers a different perspective by sending electrical stimulation to the brain. However, these devices rely on cloud-dependent AI, which introduces significant challenges, including high false positive rates, latency issues, and privacy concerns. Here we present a neuromorphic framework for real-time seizure detection and prediction, directly implemented on a neuromorphic SOC with on-chip learning capabilities. By leveraging spiking neural networks and few-shot edge learning, our system enables continual, patient-specific adaptation without requiring data transmission or cloud connectivity. For a detection framework, we pre-train a model using the TUH dataset and deploy it on the BrainChip Akida neuromorphic processor, enabling few-shot personalization on long-term recordings from the EPILEPSIAE dataset. For seizure prediction, we demonstrate robust performance on both scalp and intracranial EEG from Childrens Hospital Boston (CHB-MIT) and Freiburg (FB) datasets using a leave-one-seizure-out approach for training at the edge. For all the datasets, we achieved commendable and superior performance to state-of-the-art neural networks in metrics as AUROC, Sensitivity, and False Positive Rates (FPR), with a memory footprint drastically reduced through quantization and energy consumption orders of magnitude below conventional processors. This work represents a foundational advance toward autonomous, closed-loop neurostimulation systems capable of learning and adapting at the edge for newer generation of precision neurotechnology.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.