Back

Stakeholder Perspectives on Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health Service Utilisation in Uganda's Busoga Region: A Qualitative Exploratory Study

Nyende, N. R.; Nanteza, J.; Kiyingi, F. P.; Musoke, M.

2025-09-24 sexual and reproductive health
10.1101/2025.09.22.25336327 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveTo explore adolescents attitudes, perceptions, and preferences regarding sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services in Busoga, Uganda, and to examine community leaders and health providers perspectives to inform youth-friendly interventions. DesignExploratory qualitative study under a constructivist paradigm, using key informant interviews (KIIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs). Analysis was inductive, following Braun and Clarkes six-step thematic approach, and guided by the Health Belief Model and Andersens Behavioural Model. SettingRural and urban sites in Iganga and Bugweri districts, Uganda. ParticipantsSix KIIs with community leaders and six with health providers; four FGDs with adolescents (n=39). ResultsFive themes emerged: (1) positive attitudes toward SRH but persistent misconceptions; (2) structural and interpersonal barriers including distance, cost, and judgemental providers; (3) preference for free, peer-led, school/community-based services with gender-matched staff; (4) sociocultural constraints such as early marriage and religious prohibitions; and (5) system gaps including commodity shortages and limited staff training. ConclusionAdolescents are motivated to protect their SRH but face multilevel barriers. Culturally sensitive, adolescent-friendly strategies, peer engagement, and reliable supply chains are urgently needed. Key questionsO_ST_ABSWhat is already known on this topicC_ST_ABSO_LIAdolescents in sub-Saharan Africa face stigma, cost, and distance barriers to SRH services. C_LI What this study addsO_LIAdolescents in Busoga prefer free, peer-led, school/community-based services and describe persistent myths about contraception. C_LI How this study might affect research, practice, or policyO_LIMulti-stakeholder partnerships, including faith and cultural leaders, are essential for adolescent-friendly SRH policy and programming. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.