A machine learning model for prediction of early-onset neonatal sepsis in low- and middle-income countries: Development and validation study
Kainth, D.; Gupta, A.; Singh, P.; Prakash, S.; Thukral, A.; Deorari, A.; Kapoor, M.; Agarwal, R.; Sethi, T.; Sankar, M. J.
Show abstract
ObjectiveEarly-onset sepsis (EOS), which occurs within the first 72 hours of life, can often be fatal for neonates. Machine learning (ML) models demonstrate promise for timely diagnosis. However, current ML models primarily rely on data from high-income countries, which reduces their applicability to low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) that have a higher burden and different disease profiles. We developed an ML model for the timely prediction of culture-proven EOS in LMICs. MethodsWe conducted a secondary analysis of the Delhi Neonatal Infection Study (2011-2014) carried out in three level-3 neonatal units in India. We extracted data for inborn neonates suspected of having EOS and excluded cases of culture-negative sepsis. By implementing a dynamic 80:20 (train:test) data split, we employed two feature selection methods--Boruta and Lasso--across 64 variables and applied five machine learning techniques. We aimed to achieve 90% sensitivity to identify the optimal model based on performance metrics. The developed model was integrated into a web application and validated in an external cohort of neonates born between 2015 and 2021. ResultsOf 2,924 neonates, 548 (18.7%) had culture-proven sepsis. The mean gestation and birth weight were 35.3 ({+/-}3.8) weeks and 2,112 ({+/-}754) g, respectively. The Boruta and random forest classifier yielded the best model, which included 28 perinatal-neonatal variables. The sensitivity and specificity of the model were 90.3% and 40.6%, respectively. In external validation (n=147; 26 culture-proven sepsis cases), the models sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 92.3%, 37.2%, 24.0%, and 95.7%, respectively. The sensitivity was 100% in asymptomatic neonates with only perinatal risk factors for EOS. Using the model could have reduced antibiotic usage from 74.8% to 55.7% (risk difference: -19.1%; 95% CI: -8.3 to -29.7). ConclusionsThe ML model demonstrated high sensitivity and acceptable specificity in predicting early-onset sepsis. This prediction model has the potential to assist in the timely and reliable identification of culture-positive sepsis and may serve as a bedside decision support tool in LMICs. What is already known on this topic?O_LIMachine-learning models display a good predictive performance for neonatal sepsis prediction. C_LIO_LIExisting models, developed using data from high-income countries, have concerns regarding their generalisability and have not been externally validated. C_LI What does this study add?O_LIWe developed and externally validated a prediction algorithm using a large dataset, prospectively collected variables, and machine learning techniques to predict early-onset neonatal sepsis. C_LIO_LIThe model displayed 90.3% sensitivity and 40.6% specificity. C_LI How this study might affect research, practice or policy?O_LIOur model, incorporated as a computer-based application, can be an excellent clinical aid for enhancing the clinicians prediction of neonatal sepsis in low- and middle-income countries. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Inflammatory Biomarkers and Physiomarkers of Late-Onset Sepsis and Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Premature Infants 95%
- Clinical hypoxemia score for outpatient child pneumonia care lacking pulse oximetry in Africa and South Asia 93%
- Extremely preterm infant admissions within the SafeBoosC-III consortium during the COVID-19 lockdown 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical prediction models to diagnose neonatal sepsis in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review 97%
- The hospital burden of critical illness across global settings: a point-prevalence and cohort study in Malawi, Sri Lanka and Sweden 91%
- Essential Emergency and Critical Care – a consensus among global clinical experts 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A comparison of machine learning models versus clinical evaluation for mortality prediction in patients with sepsis 95%
- Application of the Sepsis-3 criteria to describe sepsis epidemiology in the AmsterdamUMCdb intensive care dataset 95%
- Clustering ICU patients with sepsis based on the patterns of their circulating biomarkers: a secondary analysis of the CAPTAIN prospective multicenter cohort study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Geographical validation of the Smart Triage Model by age group 94%
- External validation of a paediatric SMART triage model for use in resource limited facilities 93%
- ePOCT+ and the medAL-suite: Development of an electronic clinical decision support algorithm and digital platform for pediatric outpatients in low- and middle-income countries 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.