Back

An evaluation of clustering and assembly strategies from Iso-Seq data in the absence of reference genomes in non-model animals

Eleftheriadi, K.; Vazquez-Valls, M.; Fernandez, R.

2026-07-08 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2025.09.18.677004 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Transcriptome assembly enables the recovery of expressed genes and isoforms, but the optimal strategy for reconstructing transcriptomes from long-read sequencing remains unresolved. In particular, establishing best practices for generating accurate gene models and selecting representative isoforms is essential for comparative genomics, as for orthology inference typically only the longest isoform per gene model is included. Here, we systematically compare clustering and de novo assembly methods using PacBio Iso-Seq data from 17 animal lineages spanning seven phyla, most of them non-model species, with the goal of investigating which methodology is more adequate to select one isoform per gene model, in the absence of specific pipelines to do so. We evaluate four approaches: isoseq cluster, CD-HIT, RNA-Bloom2 and isONform. We benchmark them with short-reads using Trinity, assessing assembly quality with BUSCO completeness, short-read mapping rates, coding sequence recovery, and longest isoform prediction. Our results show that CD-HIT clustering at high similarity thresholds ([≥]99%) yields the most complete and coding-rich long-read transcriptomes, rivaling Trinity while avoiding its high redundancy. Consensus-based methods such as isoseq cluster and isONform recover fewer single-copy orthologs (mirrored in a lower BUSCO score) and achieve lower mapping rates, while RNA-Bloom2 provide intermediate performance with reduced duplication. Together, these findings establish, to date, CD-HIT as a robust and practical strategy for transcriptome reconstruction from long-read data when genomic references are unavailable. By benchmarking de novo methods across a taxonomically broad dataset, this work defines the realistic capabilities of long-read transcriptome reconstruction in the absence of a reference genome and provides practical guidance for deriving high-quality gene models and selecting representative isoforms for orthology inference in non-model species.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.1%
2
Molecular Ecology Resources
171 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.7%
3
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.8%
4
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 1%
7.7%
50% of probability mass above
5
Applications in Plant Sciences
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
6
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.2%
7
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
8
Systematic Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.0%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.1%
10
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
Genome Research
468 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
12
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 44%
1.9%
13
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
14
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.7%
15
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
16
Journal of Computational Biology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
17
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
18
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.0%
19
Journal of Heredity
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
20
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
21
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
22
Microbial Genomics
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
24
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
25
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%