Tangible advantages of multi-stage brain motion compensation for PET imaging demonstrated in multiple studies
Efthimiou, N.; Fu, J. F.; Mohammadian, M.; TSENG, C.-E.; Scipioni, M.; Zhou, I. Y.; Zurcher, N. R.; Mandeville, J.; Price, J. C.; Loggia, M.; Catana, C.
Show abstract
Head motion is a persistent challenge in positron emission tomography (PET) brain imaging, reducing quantitative accuracy, degrading time-activity curves (TACs), and complicating kinetic modeling. We evaluated a fully automated, multi-stage motion compensation framework, COMBRA (Correction of Motion and BRain Alignment), across more than one hundred scans and four independent PET studies using different radiotracers (18F-MK-6240, 11C-Raclopride, 11C-PBR28, and 11C-Martinostat). COMBRA implements a staged registration and reconstruction pipeline, enabling both inter-frame realignment and intra-frame motion-gated correction. It operates in a PET-driven mode but can incorporate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based motion tracking when available. Across dynamic datasets, COMBRA improved model fitting precision, as reflected by reduced standard error in distribution volume ratio estimates using MRTM2 modeling, and yielded more consistent test- retest outcomes. In static cohort studies, the framework enhanced regional standardized uptake value ratios, improved image contrast, and mitigated motion-induced bias. Compared to frame-to-frame realignment and MRI-guided approaches, PET-only COMBRA demonstrated equivalent or superior performance, with misalignments reduced to sub-voxel levels. Importantly, its static reconstructions provided better signal-to-noise properties and more robust quantification in high-motion cases. At the population level, COMBRA increased statistical power, suggesting that smaller sample sizes may be sufficient for future studies. Collectively, these results demonstrate that COMBRA offers a scalable, tracer-independent solution for motion compensation in brain PET imaging. By improving accuracy, reliability, and sensitivity, this framework has the potential to strengthen both mechanistic research studies and clinical investigations where subtle group differences are critical.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Validation of cardiac image derived input functions for functional PET quantification 97%
- Automated Long Axial Field of View PET Image Processing and Kinetic Modelling with the TurBO Toolbox 96%
- Non-invasive assessment of stimulation-specific changes in cerebral glucose metabolism with functional PET 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated quality control of T1-weighted brain MRI scans for clinical research: methods comparison and design of a quality prediction classifier 94%
- On the analysis of functional PET (fPET)-FDG: baseline mischaracterization can introduce artifactual metabolic (de)activations 93%
- Sensitivity of unconstrained quantitative magnetization transfer MRI to Amyloid burden in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.