Machine learning models for early prognosis prediction in cardiogenic shock
Nieto, N.; Raimondo, F.; Eickhoff, S. B.; Poss, J.; Desch, S.; Feistritzer, H.-J.; Lichtenberg, A.; Masyuk, M.; Kelm, M.; Holger, T.; Patil, K. R.; Jung, C.
Show abstract
Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a severe and frequent complication of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), necessitating rapid and accurate prognosis as-sessment to guide treatment and intensive care unit (ICU) resource allocation. We developed two machine learning models to predict 30-day outcomes following CS in AMI: an Admission model (using only data available at admission, like demography, comorbidities) and a Full model (incorporating additional laboratory values obtained within 24 hours). The models were trained on the CULPRIT-SHOCK dataset and externally validated using the eICU database. The Admission model achieved an out-of-sample AUC of 0.71 (95% CI: 0.6-0.83) in the development cohort and 0.68 in the validation cohort, while the Full model attained significantly higher performance, with AUCs of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.69-0.9) and 0.78, respectively. The Full models superior performance underscores the prognostic value of early laboratory trends, suggesting that dynamic data integration improves risk stratification. Both models outperformed existing risk scores across multiple metrics, provided well-calibrated probabilistic predictions, and demonstrated robustness to missing data. Additionally, they offered patient-level explainability, enhancing clinical interpretability. While promising, the models generalizability may be influenced by differences between the CULPRIT-SHOCK and eICU cohorts (e.g., demographics, CS severity thresholds); further validation in larger, prospective cohorts is warranted.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Continuous-Time and Dynamic Suicide Attempt Risk Prediction with Neural Ordinary Differential Equations 95%
- Development and Prospective Implementation of a Large Language Model based System for Early Sepsis Prediction 95%
- CT-based Rapid Triage of COVID-19 Patients: Risk Prediction and Progression Estimation of ICU Admission, Mechanical Ventilation, and Death of Hospitalized Patients 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting bloodstream infection outcome using machine learning 97%
- Developing And Validating COVID-19 Adverse Outcome Risk Prediction Models From A Bi-National European Cohort Of 5594 Patients 96%
- Evaluation of Domain Generalization and Adaptation on Improving Model Robustness to Temporal Dataset Shift in Clinical Medicine 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- AI-MET: A Deep Learning-based Clinical Decision Support System for Distinguishing Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children from Endemic Typhus 94%
- Drivers of Mortality in COVID ARDS Depend on Patient Sub-Type 94%
- Improving irregular temporal modeling by integrating synthetic data to the electronic medical record using conditional GANs: a case study of fluid overload prediction in the intensive care unit 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- OASIS+: leveraging machine learning to improve the prognostic accuracy of OASIS severity score for predicting in-hospital mortality 97%
- ARDSFlag: An NLP/Machine Learning Algorithm to Visualize and Detect High-Probability ARDS Admissions Independent of Provider Recognition and Billing Codes 95%
- Optimized Feature Selection and Advanced Machine Learning for Stroke Risk Prediction in Revascularized Coronary Artery Disease Patients 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification of predictive patient characteristics for assessing the probability of COVID-19 in-hospital mortality 94%
- Clinical Time-to-Event Prediction Enhanced by Incorporating Compatible Related Outcomes 94%
- Modular Clinical Decision Support Networks (MoDN)—Updatable, Interpretable, and Portable Predictions for Evolving Clinical Environments 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.