Back

Use of Generative AI for Health Among Urban Youth in Pakistan: A Mixed-Methods Study

Mashhood, A.; Ahmed, A.; Khan, I.; Hashim, M.; Baloch, S.

2025-09-23 health informatics
10.1101/2025.09.18.25335990 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundGAI tools are increasingly used informally for health, yet evidence from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is limited. This study generates early evidence on such health systems from the fifth most populous country: Pakistan. MethodsWe used a youth-led convergent mixed-methods design among digitally connected urban youth in Pakistan (survey N=1240, 20 interviews). The primary outcome was any GAI use for health. We fitted multivariable logistic regression models and conducted reflexive thematic analysis. FindingsOverall, 69.0% of participants reported using GAI for health. Higher odds of use were observed among women (aOR = 1.57, 95% CI [1.17-2.11], p = 0.003) and youth reporting any mental or physical condition (aOR = 1.82, 95% CI [1.34-2.48], p < .001). Greater trust in AI strongly predicted use (per-level aOR = 4.21, 95% CI [2.98-6.01], p < .001). High confidence using AI (aOR = 1.81, 95% CI [1.11-3.07], p = 0.022), awareness of AI risks (aOR = 1.67, 95% CI [1.20-2.31], p = 0.002), and prior use of other (non-generative) digital health tools (aOR = 4.48, 95% CI [2.59-8.23], p < .001) were also associated with higher likelihood of use. Telemedicine use was significant though weaker in magnitude (aOR = 1.58, 95% CI [1.01-2.54], p = 0.049). Interviews highlighted three themes: (1) access and affordability driving first-line use; (2) emotional safety and informational support, especially for stigmatized concerns; and (3) perceived empowerment in interpreting tests, organizing symptoms, and preparing for clinical visits. ConclusionGiven constrained, stigmatizing, and costly services, GAI may function as an adjunct "first step" for youth health information and emotional support in Pakistans health ecosystem.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.2%
2
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.4%
50% of probability mass above
3
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
10.3%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.4%
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.0%
6
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
7
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
8
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
9
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
10
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
11
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.4%
12
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
13
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
14
Preventive Medicine Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
15
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
16
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
17
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
18
Archives of Public Health
12 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
19
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
20
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
21
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
22
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
24
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%