Back

Generative continuous time model reveals epistatic signatures in protein evolution

Pagnani, A.; Barrat-Charlaix, P.

2026-07-10 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.09.17.676821 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Protein evolution is fundamentally shaped by epistasis, where the effect of a mutation depends on the sequence context. As standard phylogenetic methods assume independently evolving sites, there is a need for more complex models based on accurate estimations of the fitness landscape. Good candidates are modern generative models -- such as the Potts model -- which successfully capture epistatic effects. However, recent work on generative evolutionary models usually use discrete time, making them difficult to integrate with the standard frameworks in evolutionary biology. We introduce a continuous-time sequence evolution model using the Gillespie algorithm and parameterized by a generative Potts model. This approach enables us to simulate realistic, family-specific evolutionary trajectories and allows for direct comparison with independent-site models. Surprisingly, we find that while epistasis significantly slows down evolution, it does not change the average evolutionary rates at individual sites. This is explained by the rate heterogeneity caused by context-dependence: we show that the rate at some positions varies between null to high values depending on the context, while other positions are essentially independent from the context. Finally, we show that epistasis leads to a systematic underestimation bias in the inference of evolutionary distance between sequences. Overall, our work provides a new tool for simulating realistic protein evolution and offers novel insights into the complex interplay between epistasis and evolutionary dynamics.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
38.0%
2
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.0%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 25%
4.2%
4
Systematic Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.4%
6
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.3%
7
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.0%
8
BMC Evolutionary Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
9
Virus Evolution
155 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.3%
10
Journal of Theoretical Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.3%
11
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
12
PRX Life
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
13
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
14
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.6%
15
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
140 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
16
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.3%
17
Journal of Molecular Evolution
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
18
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
19
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
20
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
238 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
21
Physical Biology
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Journal of Computational Biology
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
24
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
25
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.6%
26
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 46%
0.6%
27
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%