Back

Nuclear genome profiling of two species of Epidendrum (Orchidaceae): genome size, repeatome and ploidy

Alcala-Gaxiola, M. A.; Salazar, G. A.; Hagsater, E.; Flores-Iniestres, M. A.; Cabrera, L. I.; Avina-Rivera, A. I.; Mercado-Ruaro, P.; Magallon, S.; Mendoza, C. G.; Nunez-Ruiz, A.; Soldevila, G.; Urrutia, A.; Meza-Lazaro, R. N.

2026-03-10 genomics
10.1101/2025.09.17.675454 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Characterizing genomic properties such as genome size, ploidy level, heterozygosity, and repetitive DNA proportion and composition without relying on genome assembly is crucial for profiling the genomes of non-model species. Little is known about the nuclear genome of the large neotropical orchid genus Epidendrum. This study compares genome profiles of Epidendrum anisatum and Epidendrum marmoratum, using flow cytometry and k-mer analysis approaches, as well as bioinformatics ploidy level estimation and repeatome characterization. Multiple depths of coverage, k values, and k-mer-based tools for genome size estimation were explored and contrasted with cytometry genome size estimations. Cytometry and k-mer analyses yielded a consistently higher genome size for E. anisatum (mean 1C genome size = 2.59 Gb) than E. marmoratum (mean 1C genome size = 1.13 Gb), which represents a 2.3-fold genome size difference. Both species were identified as diploid with no evidence of strict partial endoreplication. The most important aspects to be taken into account to improve genome size estimation were heterozygosity, depth of coverage, and the maximum k-mer coverage. The genomes of both species were found to be highly repetitive (63-73%) and heavily dominated by Ty3-gypsy retrotransposons, particularly those of the Ogre family. Additionally, the genome of E. anisatum was characterized by the presence of a 172 bp satellite (AniS1), which represented 11% of the genome size. Together, both Ty3-gypsy transposons and AniS1 shape the genome size difference between the two genomes. This study provides the first genome profiling for species in the genus Epidendrum, but also highlights the importance of using flow cytometry, cytogenetic approaches and bioinformatics techniques in combination for genome profiling.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
10.2%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.0%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 15%
6.7%
4
Gigabyte
60 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
5
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.2%
6
DNA Research
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
7
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
8
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
9
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
10
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.0%
11
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
12
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
13
Gene
41 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.0%
14
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
15
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
16
Genomics
60 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
17
Annals of Botany
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
18
Plants
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
19
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
20
The Plant Genome
53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
21
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
22
Applications in Plant Sciences
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
23
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.1%
24
Agronomy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
25
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
26
G3
33 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
27
Chromosome Research
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
28
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
Aquaculture
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
30
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%