A Rapid Assessment of Stakeholder Agreement with Brazil's New Gender-Affirming Care Restrictions
Caruso Mazzolani, B.; Longobardi, I.; Saadeh, A.; Roschel, H.; Gualano, B.
Show abstract
Transgender youth and their caregivers are rarely included in regulatory processes concerning gender-affirming care, despite being directly affected. In April 2025, the Brazilian Federal Council of Medicine (CFM) issued Resolution 2.427/2025, which banned the use of puberty blockers in all minors, prohibited hormone therapy before age 18, and introduced stricter age thresholds for surgical interventions. This study aimed to assess stakeholder perspectives regarding these new restrictions. We conducted a cross-sectional survey between May and June 2025 with patients and caregivers from Brazils largest outpatient gender identity service. A total of 54 transgender youth (mean age 13.6 {+/-} 2.0 years) and 116 caregivers completed the survey independently. Participants rated their level of agreement with each provision of the resolution using a 6-point Likert scale. Findings demonstrated overwhelming opposition to the new regulations. Among youth, 92.6% strongly disagreed with the ban on puberty blockers, 94.4% opposed restrictions on hormone therapy before 18, and 59.3% disagreed with surgical age limits. Caregivers reported similar opposition, with 93.1% rejecting the ban on puberty blockers, 89.7% rejecting restrictions on hormone therapy, and 61.2% disagreeing with surgical restrictions. Importantly, opposition was consistent across all stages of treatment engagement, including among those who had not initiated or had declined medical interventions, suggesting that disagreement is not solely attributable to personal investment in treatment. These findings highlight a substantial misalignment between regulatory policy and the perspectives of directly affected youth and families. Incorporating patient and caregiver voices, alongside clinical evidence, is essential to ensure that policies remain ethically sound and responsive to stakeholder needs. Public significance statementThis study found that over 90% of transgender youth and their caregivers in Brazil strongly oppose new bans on gender-affirming medical care, revealing a significant disconnect between regulatory policies and the lived experiences of those most affected. These findings underscore the critical importance of incorporating patient and family perspectives into healthcare policy to ensure it is both ethical and effective.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Gender-affirming care, mental health, and economic stability in the time of COVID-19: a global cross-sectional study of transgender and non-binary people 94%
- Short-term outcomes of pubertal suppression in a selected cohort of 12 to 15 year old young people with persistent gender dysphoria in the UK 93%
- Gender and mental health of adolescents: a conceptual framework developed in a Delphi study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Knowledge of Female Genital Cutting among health and social care professionals in Francophone Belgium: A cross-sectional survey 94%
- Factors associated with contraceptive use among reproductive-age women during a pandemic: Evidence from a small developing state 93%
- Correlates of reproductive coercion among young women in Kingston, Jamaica and Hanoi, Vietnam 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- ‘I was an accident’. Long-term effects of unintended pregnancy on children: Findings from the Dutch prospective birth-cohort Amsterdam Born Children and their Development study 91%
- A review of the effectiveness and experiences of welfare advice services co-located in health settings: a critical narrative systematic review 89%
- Racism and health and wellbeing among children and youth - an updated systematic review and meta-analysis 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Men and sexual and reproductive healthcare in the Nordic countries: a scoping review 92%
- Knowledge and use of lactational amenorrhea as a family planning method among adolescent mothers in Uganda: a secondary analysis of Demographic and Health Surveys between 2006 and 2016 92%
- Improving experience of medical abortion at home in a changing therapeutic, technological and regulatory landscape: a realist review 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.