Healthcare Professionals Perspectives on Schizophrenia Recovery: A Literature Review
Tasijawa, F. A.; Yusuf, A.; Pandin, M. G. R.; Herwawan, J. H.; Ninef, V. I.; Addiarto, W.; Sari, Y. K.; Wardani, E. M.
Show abstract
BackgroundRecovery is a key concept in mental health care and contributes to improving clinical practice and the quality of life of individuals living with schizophrenia. However, mental health professionals do not yet share a unified perspective and understanding of the recovery process. The aim of this study was to review healthcare professionals perspectives on schizophrenia recovery. MethodsA literature search was conducted using electronic databases including PubMed, CINAHL (EBSCO), ProQuest, and ScienceDirect, covering the years 2009 to 2019. The search employed the following keyword combinations: "Perceptions" AND "Health Workers" OR "Nursing" OR "Doctor" OR "Psychiatrists" AND "Recovery" AND "Schizophrenia." Eligible studies included original articles with healthcare professionals as participants that examined perspectives on schizophrenia recovery. ResultsOut of 439 studies screened, eight met the inclusion criteria: four qualitative studies (n = 79), three quantitative studies (n = 756), and one mixed-methods study (n = 174). Two major themes emerged: positive and negative perspectives. Positive perspectives emphasized that patients could achieve full recovery without long-term medication, engage in daily activities and employment, and experience reduced symptoms. In contrast, negative perspectives conceptualized recovery within a biomedical framework, highlighting barriers such as the impossibility of full recovery, medication dependence, and relapse. ConclusionHealthcare professionals hold diverse perspectives on schizophrenia recovery. These varying viewpoints may influence both the recovery process of individuals with schizophrenia and decision-making in mental health services. Findings from this review may serve as guidance for healthcare professionals to enhance their understanding of schizophrenia recovery.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Service user experiences of community services for Complex Emotional Needs: A qualitative thematic synthesis 94%
- Clinician perspectives on what constitutes good practice in community services for people with Complex Emotional Needs: A qualitative thematic meta-synthesis 94%
- Shared decision-making interventions in the choice of antipsychotic prescription in people living with psychosis (SHAPE): protocol for a realist review 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A qualitative meta-synthesis of service users’ and carers’ experiences of assessment and involuntary hospital admissions under mental health legislations: a five-year update 94%
- Service user perspectives of community mental health services for people with complex emotional needs: a co-produced qualitative interview study 93%
- Clinician views on best practice community care for people with complex emotional needs and how it can be achieved: a qualitative study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Self-health Management and Role of Nurses of Diabetic Patients: A systematic review during COVID-19 Pandemic 84%
- Nonpharmaceutical interventions for pandemic COVID-19: A cross-sectional investigation of US general public beliefs, attitudes, and actions 84%
- Face mask use in the Community for Reducing the Spread of COVID-19: a systematic review 83%
Similar papers in this journal
- Safe clinical practice for patients hospitalised in mental health wards during a suicidal crisis: a qualitative study of patient experiences 92%
- Study protocol for the development and internal validation of SPIRIT (Schizophrenia Prediction of Resistance to Treatment): A clinical tool for predicting risk of treatment resistance to anti-psychotics in First Episode Schizophrenia 92%
- While they wait: A cross-sectional survey on wait times for mental health treatment for anxiety and depression for Australian adolescents 91%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.