Back

Healthcare Professionals Perspectives on Schizophrenia Recovery: A Literature Review

Tasijawa, F. A.; Yusuf, A.; Pandin, M. G. R.; Herwawan, J. H.; Ninef, V. I.; Addiarto, W.; Sari, Y. K.; Wardani, E. M.

2025-09-18 nursing
10.1101/2025.09.16.25335872 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundRecovery is a key concept in mental health care and contributes to improving clinical practice and the quality of life of individuals living with schizophrenia. However, mental health professionals do not yet share a unified perspective and understanding of the recovery process. The aim of this study was to review healthcare professionals perspectives on schizophrenia recovery. MethodsA literature search was conducted using electronic databases including PubMed, CINAHL (EBSCO), ProQuest, and ScienceDirect, covering the years 2009 to 2019. The search employed the following keyword combinations: "Perceptions" AND "Health Workers" OR "Nursing" OR "Doctor" OR "Psychiatrists" AND "Recovery" AND "Schizophrenia." Eligible studies included original articles with healthcare professionals as participants that examined perspectives on schizophrenia recovery. ResultsOut of 439 studies screened, eight met the inclusion criteria: four qualitative studies (n = 79), three quantitative studies (n = 756), and one mixed-methods study (n = 174). Two major themes emerged: positive and negative perspectives. Positive perspectives emphasized that patients could achieve full recovery without long-term medication, engage in daily activities and employment, and experience reduced symptoms. In contrast, negative perspectives conceptualized recovery within a biomedical framework, highlighting barriers such as the impossibility of full recovery, medication dependence, and relapse. ConclusionHealthcare professionals hold diverse perspectives on schizophrenia recovery. These varying viewpoints may influence both the recovery process of individuals with schizophrenia and decision-making in mental health services. Findings from this review may serve as guidance for healthcare professionals to enhance their understanding of schizophrenia recovery.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.