Back

pyPatlak: Open-Source Voxel-Wise Patlak Analysis of Dynamic PET Data

Artesani, A.

2025-09-18 radiology and imaging
10.1101/2025.09.16.25335861 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe Patlak graphical analysis is a widely used method for quantifying irreversible tracer uptake in dynamic Positron Emission Tomography (PET) studies, providing key kinetic parameters such as the net influx rate (Ki) and the total distribution volume (Vd). Currently, this analysis is primarily performed using proprietary software or vendor-specific workstations, which can limit its accessibility, flexibility, and reproducibility. This work presents pyPatlak, an open-source, Python-based, platform-independent tool that performs Patlak modelling directly from dynamic PET DICOM data, offering an accessible alternative to proprietary software. MethodsThe pyPatlak script processes dynamic PET data in DICOM format to generate 3D parametric images of Ki and Vd. Key features include the normalization of a population-based input function (PBIF) with a patient-specific arterial input function (AIF), and optional correction for the partial volume effect (PVE). The script performs a voxel-by-voxel linear regression to derive the kinetic parameters. To validate the script, we compared the Ki and Vd values generated by pyPatlak with those obtained from a commercial workstations direct Patlak analysis. This validation was performed on 21 patients by segmenting seven organs of interest and comparing the values of the kinetic parameters. ResultsPyPatlak showed a good agreement with the reference direct Patlak reconstruction. Correlation analysis demonstrated strong linear relationships (Ki: R = 0.91, Vd: R = 0.93), and Lins concordance coefficients confirmed high agreement (Ki: 0.89, Vd: 0.91). Bland-Altman analysis indicated that observed differences were minimal and clinically negligible. Mean biases were approximately -0.03 ml/min/100ml for Ki and +2.2 units for Vd. Equivalence testing further confirmed that all differences fell within predefined clinically acceptable limits, despite being statistically significant in Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. ConclusionpyPatlak offers a flexible, reproducible, and transparent alternative to proprietary software for Patlak analysis. Its open-source nature and compatibility with standard DICOM data make it a valuable tool for researchers, promoting greater accessibility and standardization of kinetic modelling in PET imaging.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.3%
2
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.1%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 7%
9.9%
4
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
5
Physics in Medicine & Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.7%
7
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
8
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
9
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.0%
10
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
11
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
12
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
13
Radiotherapy and Oncology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
14
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
15
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
38 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
16
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
17
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
18
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
19
Neuroscience Bulletin
11 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
20
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
21
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
22
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
23
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%