Back

Library Size in Spatial ATAC-seq: Technical Confounder or Biology?

Ji, K. X.; Ji, H.

2025-09-18 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.09.15.676443 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Spatially resolved assay for transposase-accessible chromatin with sequencing (spATAC-seq) is an emerging technology for studying spatial variation in gene regulatory landscapes within tissues. Current analysis pipelines commonly apply library size normalization, assuming that variation in sequencing library size across cells represents a technical confounder rather than biological signal. While recent studies have shown that library size can confound biological interpretation in spatial transcriptomics, its impact in spATAC-seq remains poorly understood. Here, we show that library size in spATAC-seq data is biologically informative and that standard normalization methods can obscure important biological signals and hinder downstream analyses. These findings underscore the need for caution and for the development of improved approaches to address library size in spATAC-seq analysis.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 12%
15.0%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Genome Biology
○ 637 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
11.8%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Briefings in Bioinformatics
◐ 354 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
9.6%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Nature Methods
○ 385 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.7%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Nucleic Acids Research
◐ 1281 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.7%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Bioinformatics
◐ 1204 papers in training set
Top 4%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
◐ 242 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.5%
8
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.0%
9
Genome Research
● 468 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.4%
10
Nature Biotechnology
○ 172 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.4%
11
Communications Biology
○ 993 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.1%
12
GigaScience
◐ 212 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
13
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.4%
14
Cell Genomics
○ 172 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
15
Genome Medicine
○ 183 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
16
Bioinformatics Advances
◐ 203 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
17
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
● 242 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
18
Molecular Systems Biology
○ 162 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
19
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
● 2444 papers in training set
Top 45%
0.6%
20
Patterns
○ 78 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
21
Scientific Data
○ 209 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
22
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
188 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.