Translating 3D Slicer to Latin America Language: a Method for Making a Medical Open-Source Software Widely Available
Veiga, P. E. d. B.; Murta, L. O.; Goncalves, D. S.; Silva, L. S.; Montano-Serrano, V. M.; Laredo, E. H.; Lasso, A.; Pieper, S.; Gonzalez, A. V.; Pujol, S.
Show abstract
3D Slicer, an open-source software platform for the analysis and 3D visualization of medical imaging data, aims to make cutting-edge research tools available to clinical researchers and scientists worldwide. Until recently, the platform was only available in English. This study describes the development of an ad hoc methodology that addresses key linguistic challenges, including domain-specific vocabulary, acronyms, word order, passive voice, syntagms, and adaptation of technical terms. The translation process focuses on ensuring textual uniformity, cohesion, and accuracy while minimizing errors in biomedical computational contexts. The methodology presented may serve as a framework for similar translation efforts in diverse non-English speaking countries. Author summaryPaulo Eduardo de Barros Veiga, born in Ribeirao Preto, Sao Paulo (Brazil), holds degrees in Music, Language, and Literature, focusing on Criticism and Translation. He completed a postdoctoral fellowship (Process No. 2018/01418-2, Sao Paulo Research Foundation - FAPESP). He served as a collaborator and temporary professor in the Department of Music at FFCLRP, University of Sao Paulo, where he worked on the History and Philosophy of Art. Currently, he is involved in a research project within the Department of Computing and Mathematics at the same university, focusing on developing a biomedical imaging data platform (3D Slicer Software). Under the coordination of Prof. Sonia Pujol (Harvard University) and Prof. Luiz Murta (USP), he leads the translation of the 3D Slicer software into Brazilian Portuguese and proposes solutions and methods in Portuguese. He also engages in music, translation, research, and education projects freelance. Additionally, he is a member of the Poesis Critica research group under NAPI-CIPEM. Paulo holds a bachelors, masters, and doctoral degree in Literary Studies from the FCLAr at UNESP (Sao Paulo State University). He received a CAPES scholarship during his Masters and was awarded the Emerging Leaders in the Americas Program by the Canadian government, having studied at the University of Winnipeg. He has also lived in London.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Academic Tracker: Software for Tracking and Reporting Publications Associated with Authors and Grants 93%
- tbiExtractor: A framework for Extracting Traumatic Brain Injury Common Data Elements from Radiology Reports 92%
- Artificial intelligence tool for the study of COVID-19 microdroplet spread across the human diameter and airborne space 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ethical review of clinical research with generative AI: Evaluating ChatGPT’s accuracy and reproducibility 94%
- Performance of Generative Pretrained Transformer on the National Medical Licensing Examination in Japan 92%
- Cardiology Knowledge Assessment of Retrieval-Augmented Open versus Proprietary Large Language Models 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Large language models (GPT-5, Grok-4, Claude Opus 4.1, Gemini 2.5 Pro) achieved textbook-level accuracy on the Japanese medical licensing examination by 2025: A comparative study 91%
- Choice of Intraoperative Ultrasound adjuncts for Brain Tumor Surgery 91%
- Towards a Clinically-based Common Coordinate Framework for the Human Gut Cell Atlas - The Gut Models 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- A deep learning workflow for quantification of Micronuclei in DNA damage studies in cultured cancer cell lines: a proof of principle investigation 90%
- Digitizing ECG image: new fully automated method and open-source software code 90%
- MVPAlab: A Machine Learning decoding toolbox for multidimensional electroencephalography data 89%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.