Nurse involvement in health information technology design for digital nursing practice: a scoping review
Kobekyaa, F. K.; Boswell, D.; Sinclair, R.; Havaei, F.; Risling, T.; Haase, K. R.
Show abstract
There is growing demand for user involvement in health information technology (IT) design to ensure that emerging technologies meet the needs and expectations of end users. This scoping review explored the state of nurses involvement in health IT design, focusing on the: (1) methods, frequency, capacity, and levels of involvement in the design process; (2) types of health IT systems nurses are included in designing; and (3) outcomes of nurses inclusion in the design process. This review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. A systematic search was conducted in seven databases: MEDLINE (Ovid), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Applied Health Literature (CINAHL) (EBCOhost), Embase (Ovid), Scopus, Web of Science, Compendex Engineering Village and Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Xplore Digital Library database platforms. A total of 3,364 studies were screened at the title/abstract phase. After initial exclusions, 632 articles were screened for full texts, 495 were excluded, resulting in a final set of 137 eligible articles. Included studies most frequently involved nurses as users or testers of the technologies - usually at the end stages of the design process. Most studies interchangeably used the concepts of human-centred design and user-centred design to guide the design process. Interviews, surveys, observations and think-aloud techniques were the most frequently used design methods to elicit nurses perspectives about health IT systems. However, it was unclear which methods or approaches were most effective in engaging nurses in the design process. No standardized or validated nurse engagement frameworks were reported. These findings highlight the need to explore the nature of nurses involvement in design, their preferences in engagement and specific contributions and roles in order to develop an evidence-based approach to guide nurses participation in the design process. Author summaryNurses are rarely involved in health IT design, particularly in the early design stages. Failure to involve nurses in early stages can lead to IT systems lacking specific nursing contents, functionalities, and technical features, which may affect the use of the systems for nursing work. In this study, we found evidence of nurses being included at the end stages of the design process. Despite majority of the studies focusing on health IT design and development, nurses were mainly involved as users or testers of the technologies. In other words, nurses were mainly engaged in usability testing activities, which typically occur at the end of the design process rather than upstream design phases. We found that the concepts of human-centred design and user-centred design used interchangeably. At the end of the design processes, nurses perceived the IT systems as acceptable and usable, and either integrated or willing to integrate into clinical practice. Nurses perceived satisfaction with the design process resulting from effective technologies highlight the importance of engaging them in every stage of the design process. Our findings suggest that nurses have potential to leverage their clinical expertise and practical understanding of nursing workflows to guide health care technology design processes.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Nurses’ experience of using video consultation in a digital care setting and its impact on their workflow and communication 94%
- A Scoping Review Protocol on Integration of mobile-linked POC diagnostics in community-based healthcare: User Experience 94%
- Hospital at home: a systematic review of how medication management is conceptualised, described and implemented in practice – a study protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Understanding how the design and implementation of Online Consultations influence primary care outcomes: Systematic review of evidence with recommendations for designers, providers, and researchers 96%
- Improving Patient Engagement in Phase 2 Clinical Trials with a Trial-specific Patient Decision Aid (tPDA): A Development and Usability Study 95%
- Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based Chatbots in Promoting Health Behavioral Changes: A Systematic Review 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The NASSS (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability) framework use over time: A scoping review 97%
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 94%
- Impact of electronic medical records on healthcare delivery in Nigeria: A Review 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Using telehealth consultations for healthcare provision to patients from racial/ethnic minorities: A systematic review 94%
- What Do Clinicians Edit in Ambient AI-Drafted Clinical Documentation? A Qualitative Content Analysis 92%
- Empowering Personalized Pharmacogenomics with Generative AI Solutions 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Validating a Clinical Decision Support System for Palliative Care using healthcare professionals’ insights 94%
- A digital self-care intervention for Ugandan patients with heart failure and their clinicians: User-centred design and usability study 92%
- The experiences of 33 national COVID-19 dashboard teams during the first year of the pandemic in the WHO European Region: a qualitative study 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.