Back

Fundamental Limits of Inferring Dynamical Gene Regulatory Models from Single-Cell Data

Balubaid, A.; Bernal Tamayo, J. P.; Kumar, R.; Agboola, H.; Cabrero, D. G.; Kiani, N.; tegner, j.

2025-09-12 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.09.12.674509 bioRxiv
Show abstract

A long-standing goal in systems biology is to construct computational models that capture gene regulatory dynamics. On the one hand, graph-based regulatory network models rely on prior knowledge but are constrained by unknown kinetic parameters. On the other hand, recent advancements in single-cell sequencing technologies, particularly RNA velocity and pseudotime analysis, offer data-driven approaches to infer kinetic parameters. However, accurate modeling of biological dynamics requires the estimation of the Jacobian matrix, which captures signal propagation within a regulatory system. Several computational methods have recently emerged to infer Jacobians from single-cell data, including SpliceJAC, scMomentum, and Dynamo. Here, we evaluate these methods by analyzing Jacobian eigenvalues, assessing their ability to capture stability and oscillatory properties. Using simulated ground truth data, we find that methods such as Dynamo and scMomentum generate models that capture the behavioral properties of the cells, however, they do not reliably capture the structural properties. Our results highlight the limitations of dynamic GRN inference, namely, the inability of kinetics to alleviate the need for further structural constrains for the models to adequately reflect the structural properties of the GRN. Developing more robust approaches for Jacobian estimation from single-cell data will be essential for building accurate, large-scale dynamical models of gene regulation. Graphical AbstractOverview of Benchmarking Jacobian-based inference in single-cell RNA Data. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=138 SRC="FIGDIR/small/674509v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (28K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@13496e2org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@19e0250org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@a9db39org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@17789e2_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.