Back

High Rate of Transplantation Prior to Review of Status Exception Requests among Adult Heart Transplant Candidates

Ahn, D. J.; Nakayama, T.; Attia, A. M.; White, M.; Eap, D.; Narang, N.; Khush, K. K.; Parker, W. F.; Sasaki, K.

2025-09-15 transplantation
10.1101/2025.09.12.25335606 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundIn the United States heart allocation system, when transplant centers submit applications for status exceptions to increase waitlist priority, patients obtain the requested status upgrades immediately while their applications are sent to the regional review boards (RRBs) and reviewed retrospectively. How much time elapses between obtaining a status upgrade through exception and application receipt by the RRBs and how often transplants occur during this period is unknown. MethodsUsing the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR), we identified all adult heart transplant candidates listed between October 18, 2018 and December 31, 2023 with submitted applications for status exceptions. We assessed 1) the amount of time elapsed between submission of exception applications and their receipt by the RRBs and 2) the rate of heart transplantation during this "travel" time, stratified by whether the applications were eventually approved or denied. Additionally, using complete match run data, we estimated how many listed patients were skipped by candidates who received transplants with exceptions that were ultimately denied. Results135 transplant centers submitted status exception requests on behalf of 8,269 adult candidates during the study period, of whom 608 (7.4%) received a denial at least once. The median time from obtaining higher priority statuses immediately via exceptions to application receipt by the RRBs was 3 days. 2,087 out of 8,269 (25.2%) patients received transplants before the RRBs even received their applications, with 115 (18.9%) among 608 with eventual denials and 1,972 (25.7%) among 7,661 with approvals. The cumulative incidence of heart transplantation before application receipt for eventual denials was 19.1% (95% CI [16.0%, 22.3%]) and that for approvals was 26.2% (95% CI [25.2%, 27.1%]) (p < 0.001) at 2 weeks. Based on match run data, the 115 patients who received transplants with denied exceptions bypassed more than seven thousand potential transplant recipients. ConclusionsMore than 25% of patients with status exception requests receive heart transplants before their applications are even received by their respective RRBs, let alone reviewed. This raises significant concerns about the efficacy and fairness of retrospective review of exception requests for the allocation of valuable donor hearts.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.8%
2
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.3%
4
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.6%
5
Transplantation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
American Journal of Transplantation
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
7
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.7%
8
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.7%
9
International Journal of Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
10
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
11
npj Regenerative Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.7%
14
Circulation: Heart Failure
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
15
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
16
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
52 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
17
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
18
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
19
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
20
Kidney360
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Blood
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
26
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
27
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%