Normative Ranges for Wideband Middle Ear Muscle Reflex Magnitude: Limited Potential for Diagnosing Cochlear Deafferentation
Bramhall, N.; McMillan, G.; Kampel, S.; Heassler, A.; Whittle, N.; Szabo, H.
Show abstract
PurposeCochlear synaptopathy, the loss of the synapses between the inner hair cells and their auditory nerve fiber targets, is expected to be a common type of auditory deficit resulting from noise exposure or aging. Unfortunately, there is currently no means for diagnosing cochlear synaptopathy or other forms of cochlear deafferentation. Wideband middle ear muscle reflexes (MEMRs) have been proposed as a potential diagnostic indictor of cochlear deafferentation, but we lack normative ranges for MEMR magnitude. The objective of this study was to develop normative ranges for wideband MEMR magnitude that can be used to identify patients with abnormally weak MEMRs. MethodNormative ranges were generated for ipsilateral and contralateral wideband MEMR magnitude in a population at low risk for cochlear synaptopathy due to young age, normal hearing thresholds, and minimal noise exposure history. The normative ranges were statistically adjusted for average distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) levels to account for possible impacts of outer hair cell dysfunction. To evaluate the ability of the normative ranges to differentiate between populations at low versus high risk of synaptopathy, measurements were also collected from military Veterans with normal hearing thresholds who reported at least one of the auditory complaints predicted to result from synaptopathy - tinnitus, speech perception in noise difficulty, or decreased sound tolerance. ResultsFor individuals with poorer DPOAEs, it is not possible to fall below the lower bounds of the wideband MEMR normative ranges. For individuals with more robust DPOAEs, the lower bounds are very close to an MEMR magnitude indicating an absent reflex. Few individuals from the high-risk sample fell below the normative ranges, suggesting that these normative ranges do not identify significant cochlear deafferentation as expected. ConclusionsWideband MEMR magnitude normative ranges will not be effective as a stand-alone indicator of cochlear deafferentation.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The relationship between distortion product otoacoustic emissions and audiometric thresholds in the extended high-frequency range 98%
- Air-Conduction And Bone-Conduction Reference Threshold Levels – A Multicenter Study 98%
- Intrasubject variability in Potential Early Markers of Sensorineural Hearing Damage 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving Sensitivity of the Digits-in-Noise Test using Antiphasic Stimuli 97%
- Longitudinal Electrocochleography as an Objective Measure of Serial Behavioral Audiometry in Electro-Acoustic Stimulation Patients 97%
- A level adjusted cochlear frequency-to-place map for estimating tonotopic frequency mismatch with a cochlear implant 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Brainstem Auditory Physiology in Children with Listening Difficulties 98%
- The relationship between auditory brainstem responses, cognitive ability, and speech-in-noise perception among young adults with normal hearing thresholds 97%
- The Audible Contrast Threshold (ACT™) test: a clinical spectro-temporal modulation detection test 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting cochlear synaptopathy in mice with varying degrees of outer hair cell dysfunction using auditory evoked potentials 97%
- Enhanced Place Specificity of the Parallel Auditory Brainstem Response: An Electrophysiological Study 96%
- Optimizing auditory brainstem response acquisition using interleaved frequencies 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.