Real-world feasibility of ERS asthma diagnosis guidelines for school-aged children

BackgroundClinical practice guidelines for asthma diagnosis are rarely evaluated in real-life practice. Within the Swiss Paediatric Airway Cohort (SPAC), we initiated the SPAC-asthma project to develop a standardised diagnostic approach for school-aged asthma, based on the algorithm recommended by the European Respiratory Society (ERS) guideline. Here, we report the development and feasibility of this approach after implementation across multiple paediatric pulmonology clinics. MethodWe used a modified Delphi process with paediatric pulmonologists from participating clinics to tailor the ERS algorithm for feasible implementation in children aged 5-17 years with suspected asthma. Key adaptations included selection of initial tests, criteria for further testing, test cutoffs, the role of medication trial and follow-up procedures. One year after implementation, we evaluated adherence to the adapted approach at four clinics and explored the reasons for any deviations. ResultsThe final SPAC-asthma approach included spirometry, fractional exhaled nitric oxide and allergy testing as initial tests, followed by either bronchodilator reversibility testing, bronchial challenge test or medication trial. Overall adherence after one year was 77% (182/236 patients). Deviations were due to practice-related (e.g., different criteria for bronchial obstruction), patient-related (e.g., inability to perform spirometry), and logistical reasons (e.g., scheduling difficulties). ConclusionThe diagnostic approach was well implemented, but the observed deviations highlighted the need for flexibility when applying guidelines in real-world settings. As a next step, we will assess whether implementing the ERS asthma guidelines in school-aged children improves diagnostic accuracy. Take home messageWe tested a standardised ERS guideline-based approach to diagnose school-age asthma across Swiss paediatric pulmonology clinics. After expert adaptation and a year, adherence was good and we identified areas to improve guideline implementation.