Integrating molecular and physiological approaches to quantify genetic controls for wheat development and improve phenotyping
Brown, H. E.; McCallum, J.; Johnston, P.; Pither-Joyce, M.; Macknight, R.; Huth, N.; Moot, D.; Zheng, B.; zhao, z.; Wang, E.
Show abstract
Disentangling genotype x environment (GxE) effects is critical to understand the performance of wheat across different environments. A framework for doing this was previously presented in a model that integrated knowledge of crop physiology and the Vrn gene feedback loop to explain and predict the time of anthesis. The aims of this study were: 1) provide an updated description of the Cereal Anthesis Molecular Phenology (CAMP) model; 2) to verify the models assumptions regarding the relationship between Vrn gene expression and the timing of phenological stages in a set of diverse genotypes and environments; 3) to use the CAMP model to establish a phenotyping strategy for use in genetic studies and model parameterisation. Six wheat genotypes with a range of cool temperature and photoperiod sensitivities were evaluated. Apical development, final leaf number (FLN) and temporal expression of Vrn1, Vrn2 and Vrn3 were compared with model predictions. There was a clear relationship between FLN responses to cool temperature and photoperiod, the timing of phenological events and the patterns of Vrn gene expression for all genotypes. There was general agreement between the temporal patterns of foliar gene expression observed with those assumed by CAMP, but some obvious discrepancies. These may be related to differences between gene expression in foliar (observed) and apical (assumed by the model) parts of the plant, or differences in the way observed and modelled gene expression are scaled. Overall, the model described all the observed development responses to environment and provides a basis for building quantitative predictions of field-based development from genotypic and environmental data. A protocol is presented for phenotyping wheat using FLN measured in specific combinations of temperature and photoperiod. It allows easy and unconfounded measure of key developmental phenotypes that clearly relate to the genetic make-up of the plants and underlying gene expression profiles.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- From Photoperiod Thresholds to Photoperiod sensitivity: Dual Strategies for Cost-Effective Speed Breeding and Climate-Ready Barley 96%
- The trade-off between grain weight and grain number in wheat is explained by the overlapping of the key phases determining these major yield components 96%
- Incorporating gene expression and environment improves genomic prediction of wheat traits 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of non-transgenic glyphosate tolerant wheat by TILLING 96%
- Transpiration efficiency variations in the pearl millet reference collection PMiGAP 95%
- Multi-trait random regression models increase genomic prediction accuracy for a temporal physiological trait derived from high-throughput phenotyping 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.