Comprehensive Comparison of a Genotype-Forward vs. Phenotype-Forward Approach for Monogenic Cardiovascular Diseases in the UK Biobank Cohort
Ramaker, M. E.; Corey, K. M.; Regan, J. A.; Coles, S.; Abdulrahim, J. W.; Kottilil, K.; Nafissi, N.; Amos, K.; Mac Neal, M.; Kwee, L. C.; Selvaraj, S.; Shah, S. H.
Show abstract
BackgroundMonogenic cardiovascular diseases (MCVD) remain substantially under-diagnosed, and thus interest is shifting from a phenotype-forward approach towards a genotype-first strategy that applies to population-wide genomic screening. We evaluated the prevalence of pathogenic and predicted pathogenic MCVD variants and assessed disease expression in the population-based UK Biobank (UKB) cohort to determine whether yield is greater in phenotype-versus genotype-forward approach. MethodsPathogenic and likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants, and variants of uncertain significance (VUS) predicted to be pathogenic (pp-VUS) in 47 MCVD genes were assessed. In the genotype-forward approach, UKB participants with P/LPs or pp-VUS were assessed for symptoms of disease using electronic health record (EHR) interrogation, emulating a clinical approach to population-based screening. In the phenotype-forward approach, participants with stricter EHR-based evidence of disease expression were identified (emulating current clinical care) and the presence of P/LPs and pp-VUS was determined. ResultsFollowing QC, 467,850 participants were included. Overall, 1 in 125 participants in UKB carry an MCVD P/LP. In the genotype-forward approach, 3,709 (0.79%) participants carried an MCVD P/LP and 42.1% of these had symptoms of the associated MCVD; another 29,269 (6.3%) carried a pp-VUS with 21.5% of these having symptoms of disease. In the phenotype-forward approach, 62,488 (13.4%) expressed an MCVD using strict evidence of disease expression and of these individuals 1% carried an associated P/LP variant and 2.4% carried an associated pp-VUS. ConclusionWe show here that a genotype-forward approach leads to a 2.5 times higher diagnostic yield (3.6 times higher when considering pp-VUS) compared with the phenotype-forward approach, which missed 936 P/LP carriers with disease symptoms. While cost, access and ethics need to be considered, these results support expanded population-based genetic screening to improve diagnosis of potentially treatable MCVD.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Variant location is a novel risk factor for individuals with arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy due to a desmoplakin (DSP) truncating variant 96%
- Natural History, Phenotype Spectrum and Clinical Outcomes of Desmin ( DES )-Associated Cardiomyopathy 95%
- ALPK3 heterozygous truncating variants cause late-onset hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with frequent apical involvement and apical aneurysm 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) Familial Hypercholesterolemia Variant Curation Expert Panel consensus guidelines for LDLR variant classification 94%
- Genome sequencing reveals the impact of non-canonical exon inclusions in rare genetic disease 93%
- Variant Curation Expert Panel Recommendations for RYR1 Pathogenicity Assertions in Malignant Hyperthermia Susceptibility 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pathogenic and uncertain genetic variants have clinical cardiac correlates in diverse biobank participants 97%
- Performance of a Protein Language Model for Variant Annotation in Cardiac Disease 95%
- Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy -- The Impact of Age at Diagnosis of the Proband on Genetic Yield, Clinical Presentation, Outcomes, and Yield of Family Screening 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Beyond gene-disease validity: capturing structured data on inheritance, allelic-requirement, disease-relevant variant classes, and disease mechanism for inherited cardiac conditions 97%
- A validated heart-specific model for splice-disrupting variants in childhood heart disease 93%
- The impact of damaging epilepsy and cardiac genetic variant burden in sudden death in the young 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.