Back

Early Insights from the Pumping Marvellous Home-Based Digital Cardiac Rehabilitation for Heart Failure in the UK

Sankaranarayanan, R.; Hartshorne-Evans, N.; Hornby, K.; Sunter, M.; Millerick, Y.; Barton, C.; Fuat, A.; Satchithananda, D.; Ahmed, F.; Doherty, P.

2025-09-12 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2025.09.11.25334847 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundCardiac rehabilitation (CR) uptake for heart failure (HF) in the UK remains low at around 15%, with evidence of disparities based on sex, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, availability of staffing and financial constraints. We analysed data from the Pumping Marvellous Foundation online home CR programme to understand who accesses this service and whether inequities persist, to help guide strategies to achieve equitable rehabilitation delivery. MethodsThe PMF online home CR platform was launched in August 2024 along with an educational booklet available for order (at no cost) by HF or CR teams. We analysed anonymised data (n=673) of registrants from August 2024 to July 2025. Variables analysed included demographics, ethnicity, deprivation index, HF type based on ejection fraction, referral source, time since diagnosis and prior CR participation. We also analysed CR booklet orders and assessed correlation with HF admissions as per national HF audit data. Descriptive statistics summarised distributions. Results673 participants (median age 62 years; IQR 18 to 90 years, 12% aged >76 years) registered for the online CR classes from August 2024 to July 2025. The majority (63%) were women, and 6% were from minority ethnic communities. 35% of registrants had either mildly reduced (HFmrEF) or preserved (HFpEF) ejection fraction. 30% of referrals were from HF or CR teams, 29% obtained information via social media, and around 25% obtained information directly from PMF groups. There were also direct referrals from GPs (4%) and around 10% obtained referral information via Google search or YouTube. Analysis of the time since HF diagnosis demonstrated late entry to CR: 343 (51%) registered >12 months post-diagnosis, 88 (13%) within 3 months, and 130 (19%) within 6 to 12 months. Only 38 (6%) reported any prior CR participation. We also correlated CR booklet orders from hospitals with National HF Audit HF admissions. Within the limitations of the spread of the scatter, there was a general positive relationship: hospitals with more HF admissions tended to order more booklets. 33% of registrants came from the top 20 most deprived cities in England. ConclusionsBy providing free lifetime access to online cardiac rehabilitation, widening the access of cardiac rehab to more women and people without access to standard cardiac rehabilitation (due to staffing, cost constraints, accessibility issues) and reaching areas with socio-economic deprivation, the PMF online cardiac rehab platform can help to increase CR uptake and reduce the inequity in access to CR in the UK.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.0%
2
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.6%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.5%
4
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.9%
6
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.0%
8
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.7%
9
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
10
Circulation: Heart Failure
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
11
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
12
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
13
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
14
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
15
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
16
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
17
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
18
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
19
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
20
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
21
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
22
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 74%
0.8%
24
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
25
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
27
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.7%
28
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
30
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%