Back

Early Insights from the Pumping Marvellous Home-Based Digital Cardiac Rehabilitation for Heart Failure in the UK

Sankaranarayanan, R.; Hartshorne-Evans, N.; Hornby, K.; Sunter, M.; Millerick, Y.; Barton, C.; Fuat, A.; Satchithananda, D.; Ahmed, F.; Doherty, P.

2025-09-12 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2025.09.11.25334847
Show abstract

BackgroundCardiac rehabilitation (CR) uptake for heart failure (HF) in the UK remains low at around 15%, with evidence of disparities based on sex, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, availability of staffing and financial constraints. We analysed data from the Pumping Marvellous Foundation online home CR programme to understand who accesses this service and whether inequities persist, to help guide strategies to achieve equitable rehabilitation delivery. MethodsThe PMF online home CR platform was launched in August 2024 along with an educational booklet available for order (at no cost) by HF or CR teams. We analysed anonymised data (n=673) of registrants from August 2024 to July 2025. Variables analysed included demographics, ethnicity, deprivation index, HF type based on ejection fraction, referral source, time since diagnosis and prior CR participation. We also analysed CR booklet orders and assessed correlation with HF admissions as per national HF audit data. Descriptive statistics summarised distributions. Results673 participants (median age 62 years; IQR 18 to 90 years, 12% aged >76 years) registered for the online CR classes from August 2024 to July 2025. The majority (63%) were women, and 6% were from minority ethnic communities. 35% of registrants had either mildly reduced (HFmrEF) or preserved (HFpEF) ejection fraction. 30% of referrals were from HF or CR teams, 29% obtained information via social media, and around 25% obtained information directly from PMF groups. There were also direct referrals from GPs (4%) and around 10% obtained referral information via Google search or YouTube. Analysis of the time since HF diagnosis demonstrated late entry to CR: 343 (51%) registered >12 months post-diagnosis, 88 (13%) within 3 months, and 130 (19%) within 6 to 12 months. Only 38 (6%) reported any prior CR participation. We also correlated CR booklet orders from hospitals with National HF Audit HF admissions. Within the limitations of the spread of the scatter, there was a general positive relationship: hospitals with more HF admissions tended to order more booklets. 33% of registrants came from the top 20 most deprived cities in England. ConclusionsBy providing free lifetime access to online cardiac rehabilitation, widening the access of cardiac rehab to more women and people without access to standard cardiac rehabilitation (due to staffing, cost constraints, accessibility issues) and reaching areas with socio-economic deprivation, the PMF online cardiac rehab platform can help to increase CR uptake and reduce the inequity in access to CR in the UK.

Matching journals

1
Open Heart
BMJ · based on 18 published papers
#1
100× avg
2
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 5%
4.5× avg
3
Heart
BMJ · based on 10 published papers
#1
98× avg
4
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 15 published papers
Top 0.6%
35× avg
5
Circulation
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 37 published papers
Top 3%
11× avg
6
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 76%
3.1%
7
Circulation: Heart Failure
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.6%
37× avg
8
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 30 published papers
Top 2%
10× avg
9
The Lancet Digital Health
Elsevier BV · based on 25 published papers
Top 0.8%
14× avg
10
Journal of the American Heart Association
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 92 published papers
Top 7%
3.3× avg
11
Emergency Medicine Journal
BMJ · based on 20 published papers
Top 1.0%
11× avg
12
BJGP Open
Royal College of General Practitioners · based on 12 published papers
Top 0.8%
25× avg
13
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Frontiers Media SA · based on 33 published papers
Top 5%
4.9× avg
14
The American Journal of Cardiology
Elsevier BV · based on 15 published papers
Top 3%
11× avg
15
European Heart Journal
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 14 published papers
Top 4%
8.8× avg
16
BMC Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 155 published papers
Top 13%
1.9× avg
17
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 19 published papers
Top 2%
9.0× avg
18
BMJ
BMJ · based on 49 published papers
Top 4%
5.4× avg
19
JMIR Formative Research
JMIR Publications Inc. · based on 31 published papers
Top 5%
4.1× avg
20
International Journal of Cardiology
Elsevier BV · based on 13 published papers
Top 3%
8.6× avg
21
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
Top 2%
11× avg
22
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 11 published papers
Top 3%
8.9× avg
23
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 12 published papers
Top 2%
13× avg
24
BMC Health Services Research
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 43 published papers
Top 5%
3.7× avg
25
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ · based on 15 published papers
Top 3%
6.9× avg
26
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 85%
0.7%
27
npj Digital Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 85 published papers
Top 13%
0.7%