Early Insights from the Pumping Marvellous Home-Based Digital Cardiac Rehabilitation for Heart Failure in the UK
Sankaranarayanan, R.; Hartshorne-Evans, N.; Hornby, K.; Sunter, M.; Millerick, Y.; Barton, C.; Fuat, A.; Satchithananda, D.; Ahmed, F.; Doherty, P.
Show abstract
BackgroundCardiac rehabilitation (CR) uptake for heart failure (HF) in the UK remains low at around 15%, with evidence of disparities based on sex, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, availability of staffing and financial constraints. We analysed data from the Pumping Marvellous Foundation online home CR programme to understand who accesses this service and whether inequities persist, to help guide strategies to achieve equitable rehabilitation delivery. MethodsThe PMF online home CR platform was launched in August 2024 along with an educational booklet available for order (at no cost) by HF or CR teams. We analysed anonymised data (n=673) of registrants from August 2024 to July 2025. Variables analysed included demographics, ethnicity, deprivation index, HF type based on ejection fraction, referral source, time since diagnosis and prior CR participation. We also analysed CR booklet orders and assessed correlation with HF admissions as per national HF audit data. Descriptive statistics summarised distributions. Results673 participants (median age 62 years; IQR 18 to 90 years, 12% aged >76 years) registered for the online CR classes from August 2024 to July 2025. The majority (63%) were women, and 6% were from minority ethnic communities. 35% of registrants had either mildly reduced (HFmrEF) or preserved (HFpEF) ejection fraction. 30% of referrals were from HF or CR teams, 29% obtained information via social media, and around 25% obtained information directly from PMF groups. There were also direct referrals from GPs (4%) and around 10% obtained referral information via Google search or YouTube. Analysis of the time since HF diagnosis demonstrated late entry to CR: 343 (51%) registered >12 months post-diagnosis, 88 (13%) within 3 months, and 130 (19%) within 6 to 12 months. Only 38 (6%) reported any prior CR participation. We also correlated CR booklet orders from hospitals with National HF Audit HF admissions. Within the limitations of the spread of the scatter, there was a general positive relationship: hospitals with more HF admissions tended to order more booklets. 33% of registrants came from the top 20 most deprived cities in England. ConclusionsBy providing free lifetime access to online cardiac rehabilitation, widening the access of cardiac rehab to more women and people without access to standard cardiac rehabilitation (due to staffing, cost constraints, accessibility issues) and reaching areas with socio-economic deprivation, the PMF online cardiac rehab platform can help to increase CR uptake and reduce the inequity in access to CR in the UK.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Multispecialty multidisciplinary input into comorbidities in heart failure reduces hospitalisation and clinic attendance 96%
- The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Cardiology Services 92%
- Machine learning approaches to predict 30-day mortality following percutaneous coronary intervention in an Australian population 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of the first wave of COVID-19 on those with lifelong conditions: a case study of congenital heart disease 94%
- Face-to-face interventions to encourage enrolment in cardiac rehabilitation; a scoping review protocol 93%
- Development of a resilience assessment tool for cardiac care pathways in Europe: A mixed-methods study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Integrating remote monitoring into heart failure patients’ care regimen: A pilot study 93%
- Mapping rehabilitation pathways after cardiac surgery: Identifying key points for patient involvement and gaps in care 93%
- Multimodal Prehabilitation in People Awaiting Acute Inpatient Cardiac Surgery: Study Protocol for a Pilot Feasibility Trial (PreP-ACe) 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of Indicators of Reproducibility and Transparency in Published Cardiology Literature 90%
- Evaluation of antithrombotic use and COVID-19 outcomes in a nationwide atrial fibrillation cohort 90%
- Lifestyle physical activity intensity and rapid-rate non-sustained ventricular tachycardia in arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and Validation of a parsimonious AI-Based Risk Score for Mortality in Heart Failure: A UK cohort study 91%
- Development and Multinational Validation of an Ensemble Deep Learning Algorithm for Detecting and Predicting Structural Heart Disease Using Noisy Single-lead Electrocardiograms 88%
- Natural Language Processing to Identify Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Aortic Stenosis 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.