Clinical evidence of variable proton relative biological effectiveness in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients
Tang, T. T.; He, Y.; McCoy, K.; Adair, A.; Yepes, P.; Wu, C. C.; Cardenas, C. E.; Pollard-Larkin, J.; Flint, D. B.; Peterson, C. B.; Liao, Z.; Mohan, R.; Brock, K.
Show abstract
Background and PurposeTo derive and validate the proton variable relative biological effectiveness (RBE) from CT imaging changes in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Materials and MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed data for patients previously treated on a prospective randomized trial with standard fractionated intensity-modulated photon therapy (IMPT) or passive scattering proton therapy (PSPT). CT image density change (IDC) was calculated in the normal ipsilateral lung between the planning and follow-up CT. Using IDC as the clinical evidence of response, we correlated dose-IDC relationships by fitting a modified Lyman-Kutcher-Burman NTCP model for each treatment modality. RBE was calculated with corresponding planned dose for the IMRT patients and planned physical dose for PSPT patients from the fitted NTCP model. To validate the measured clinical radiographic-based RBE values, we benchmarked the measured RBE values with those calculated from the McNamara, Wedenberg, Mairani, and Flint empirical models. In addition, we also fitted the McNamara and Wedenberg models using the measured RBE, LETd, and IDC values. ResultsThe IDC-based RBE values ranged from 1.3-2.3. Linear regression comparing the radiographic-based RBE value with the empirical models, returned R2 values of 0.025-0.72. The fitted McNamara and Wedenberg models returned pseudo-R2 values of 0.95 and 0.85, respectively. ConclusionRBE values can be computed from CT image density changes as the clinical endpoint and validated using published empirical models. This is the first study to demonstrate the potential of using a clinical radiographic-based endpoint to improve our understanding of the biological effects of proton therapy.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Redefining FLASH RT: the impact of mean dose rate and dose per pulse in the gastrointestinal tract 96%
- Discordance in acute gastrointestinal toxicity between synchrotron-based proton and linac-based electron ultra-high dose rate irradiation 96%
- Cluster-Based Toxicity Estimation of Osteoradionecrosis via Unsupervised Machine Learning: Moving Beyond Single Dose-Parameter Normal Tissue Complication Probability by Using Whole Dose-Volume Histograms for Cohort Risk Stratification 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Morphological changes after cranial fractionated photon radiotherapy: localized loss of white matter and grey matter volume with increasing dose 96%
- Detection of Alteration in Carotid Artery Volumetry Using Standard-of-care Computed Tomography Surveillance Scans Following Unilateral Radiation Therapy for Early-stage Tonsillar Squamous Cell Carcinoma Survivors: A Cross-Sectional Internally-Matched Carotid Isodose Analysis 94%
- Dose-dependent volume loss in subcortical deep grey matter structures after cranial radiotherapy 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Dosimetric and biologic intercomparison between electron and proton FLASH beams 97%
- LITE SABR M1: a Phase I Trial of Lattice Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Large Tumors 95%
- Evaluation of indirect damage and damage saturation effects in dose-response curves of hypofractionated radiotherapy of early-stage NSCLC and brain metastases 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Leveraging intelligent optimization for automated, cardiac-sparing accelerated partial breast treatment planning 96%
- Avasopasem Manganese acts as both a Radioprotector and a Radiomitigator of Radiation-Induced Acute or Late Effects. 95%
- Deep-Learning-Based Generation of Synthetic High-Resolution MRI from Low-Resolution MRI for Use in Head and Neck Cancer Adaptive Radiotherapy 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.