Identifying High-Risk Adolescents for Mental Health Difficulties: A Machine Learning Analysis of the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children Study Across 46 Countries
Chen, S.; Long, C.; Cai, Y.; Du, S.; Yang, Y.; Li, Y.; Lu, J.; Liu, G.; Louw, Q. A.; Ni, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundAdolescent mental health represents a global public health crisis, yet traditional surveillance methods lack the scalability and predictive power needed for effective early identification. This study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning framework to predict multiple psychosomatic health complaints (MPHC), a key indicator of mental distress, using large-scale, multi-national population survey data. MethodsData were drawn from the 2017-2018 Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) survey, comprising an analytical sample of 225,421 adolescents aged 11, 13, and 15 years from 46 countries. The primary outcome was daily MPHC. The dataset was partitioned for training (80%) and testing (20%), with eight distinct machine learning algorithms developed and evaluated. Analyses were stratified by sex and school grade. Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) analysis was applied to the optimal models to identify the most important predictors of mental health risk. ResultsMachine learning models demonstrated robust discriminatory performance for identifying adolescents with daily MPHC, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) values ranging from 0.76 to 0.79 across subgroups. Model performance peaked for girls in Grade 7 (AUC = 0.79; 95% CI: 0.78-0.80). SHAP analysis revealed that modifiable psychosocial factors were the most powerful predictors. High academic pressure, problematic social media use, and low family support consistently emerged as the top predictors across all subgroups. The analysis uncovered distinct, sex-differentiated risk architectures: for boys, physical fighting was a uniquely persistent and high-impact predictor across all grades, while for girls, difficulties with parental communication and academic pressure were particularly salient, especially during mid-adolescence. ConclusionsMachine learning applied to standardized population survey data offers a scalable, accurate paradigm for predictive public health screening of adolescents at mental health risk. The findings challenge a "one-size-fits-all" approach, providing a data-driven mandate for the design of developmentally-timed and sex-specific interventions that target the distinct psychosocial risk factors shaping adolescent well-being.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A cross-national study of factors associated with women’s perinatal mental health and wellbeing during the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
- Psychosocial factors associated with mental health and quality of life during the COVID-19 pandemic among low-income urban dwellers in Peninsular Malaysia 94%
- Mental health and burnout during medical school: Longitudinal evolution and covariates 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Correlates of behavioral and emotional disorders among school-going adolescents in Uganda 94%
- Prevalence and associated factors of mental and substance use problems among adults in Kenya: a community-based cross-sectional study 94%
- Mechanisms for the prevention of adolescent intimate partner violence: a realist review of interventions in low- and middle-income countries 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Capability impacts of the Covid-19 lockdown in association with mental well-being, social connections and existing vulnerabilities: an Austrian survey study 95%
- Association between sexual violence and depression is mediated by perceived social support among female University students in the Kingdom of Eswatini 93%
- Age at separation, residential mobility, and depressive symptoms among twins in late adolescence and young adulthood: a FinnTwin12 cohort study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Have the COVID-19 Pandemic and Lockdown Affected Children’s Mental Health in the Long Term? A Repeated Cross-Sectional Study 95%
- The COVID in the Context of Pregnancy, Infancy and Parenting (CoCoPIP) Study: protocol for a longitudinal study of parental mental health, social interactions, physical growth, and cognitive development of infants during the pandemic 94%
- “When will this end? Will it end?” The impact of the March-June 2020 UK Covid-19 lockdown response on mental health: a longitudinal survey of mothers in the Born in Bradford study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Internalizing Problems Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Dutch Children and Adolescents with and without Pre-Existing Mental Health Problems 95%
- What Treatment Outcomes Matter Most? A Q-study of Outcome Priority Profiles Among Youth with Lived Experience of Depression 95%
- The impact of COVID-19 on the lives and mental health of Australian adolescents 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.