Back

ISO-101, a Wrist-Worn Isometric Counter-Manoeuvre Device, Improves Blood Pressure Recovery in Orthostatic Hypotension

Connolly, L.; Smith, A.; Fawkes, N.; McGowan, I.; Frith, J.

2025-09-12 geriatric medicine
10.1101/2025.09.10.25335481
Show abstract

ISO-101 is a novel wrist-worn device designed to deliver guided upper-limb isometric counter-manoeuvres via a retractable resistance tether with visual feedback. This proof-of-concept study evaluated feasibility, safety and preliminary efficacy in adults with orthostatic hypotension (OH). In a fixed-sequence, within-participant design, each participant completed three active-stand assessments: unassisted; device activation while supine immediately before standing; and device activation immediately after standing. The primary outcome was the proportion of responders, defined a priori as achieving, with device use versus the unassisted condition, [≥]10 mmHg improvement in any one of resting blood pressure, nadir standing blood pressure at 30- 60 s, or reduction in the orthostatic blood-pressure drop (systolic or diastolic). The study was powered to test the responder proportion against a 20% benchmark derived from standard non-pharmacological care. Seventeen participants were enrolled (mean age 72 years; 77% male) and fourteen completed all assessments. Six of fourteen (43%) met the responder definition, exceeding the benchmark (exact binomial p=0.012). When the device was used immediately after standing, responders showed mean (SD) increases of +22.13 (16.29) mmHg systolic and +19.52 (12.47) mmHg diastolic compared with the unassisted stand; pre-stand activation yielded smaller, non-significant changes. No adverse events occurred. Usability was high, with 88% rating the device easy to use and 69% indicating they would use it in daily life. ISO-101 produced clinically meaningful improvements in orthostatic blood pressure in a substantial subset of patients, supporting progression to larger, controlled evaluations. WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWNO_LIOrthostatic hypotension (OH) is common and clinically significant, yet counter-manoeuvres are often poorly implemented in practice. C_LIO_LIWearable assistance for standardised counter-manoeuvres has not previously been tested in OH. C_LI WHAT THIS STUDY ADDSO_LIIn this proof-of-concept study, ISO-101, a guided wrist-worn device, achieved a clinically meaningful and statistically significant responder rate, exceeding that typically observed with standard care. C_LIO_LIResponders demonstrated marked increases in postural blood pressure, the device was rated as highly usable, and no adverse events were reported. C_LI HOW THIS STUDY MIGHT AFFECT RESEARCH, PRACTICE OR POLICYO_LIThese findings highlight the potential for wearable-assisted therapy in OH and support the need for further clinical evaluation. C_LI TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06039410

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 29%
15.9%
2
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 9%
11.6%
3
Frontiers in Physiology
based on 18 papers
Top 0.1%
10.5%
4
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
based on 12 papers
Top 0.1%
10.5%
5
DIGITAL HEALTH
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 40%
4.7%
7
Cureus
based on 64 papers
Top 5%
3.1%
8
Sensors
based on 18 papers
Top 0.8%
2.9%
9
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
based on 12 papers
Top 0.3%
2.9%
10
PLOS Digital Health
based on 88 papers
Top 5%
2.9%
11
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
based on 12 papers
Top 0.5%
2.6%
12
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
based on 11 papers
Top 0.2%
2.4%
13
Age and Ageing
based on 27 papers
Top 1%
1.6%
14
eClinicalMedicine
based on 55 papers
Top 2%
1.4%
15
npj Digital Medicine
based on 85 papers
Top 10%
1.4%
16
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
based on 12 papers
Top 0.9%
1.2%
17
Trials
based on 24 papers
Top 3%
1.2%
18
PLOS Medicine
based on 95 papers
Top 13%
0.9%
19
BMC Neurology
based on 11 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
20
JAMA Network Open
based on 125 papers
Top 17%
0.8%
21
Journal of Clinical Medicine
based on 77 papers
Top 17%
0.7%
22
The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
based on 15 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
based on 29 papers
Top 3%
0.7%
24
BMC Geriatrics
based on 15 papers
Top 2%
0.7%